Affiliation:
1. From the Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet; Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group Secretariat, Copenhagen; Vejle Hospital, Vejle; Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus; Roskilde Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark; Radiumhemmet and Cancer Center Karolinska, Karolinska Institutet and University Hospital, Stockholm; Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Oslo University Hospital, Ullevaal, Norway; and Manchester University/Paterson Institute, Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Abstract
PurposeTo evaluate docetaxel or vinorelbine, both with trastuzumab, as first-line therapy of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive advanced breast cancer.Patients and MethodsPatients naive to chemotherapy for advanced disease were randomly assigned to docetaxel 100 mg/m2day 1 or vinorelbine 30 to 35 mg/m2on days 1 and 8, both combined with trastuzumab (8-mg/kg loading dose and 6-mg/kg maintenance dose) on day 1 every 3 weeks. The primary end point was time to progression (TTP).ResultsA total of 143 patients were randomly allocated to docetaxel, and 141 patients were assigned to vinorelbine. The median TTP for docetaxel and vinorelbine respectively was 12.4 months versus 15.3 months (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.94; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.25; P = .67), median overall survival was 35.7 months versus 38.8 months (HR = 1.01; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.42; P = .98), and the 1-year survival rate was 88% in both arms. Median time to treatment failure for study chemotherapy was 5.6 months versus 7.7 months (HR = 0.50; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.64; P < .0001). The investigator-assessed overall response rate among 241 patients with measurable disease were 59.3% in both arms. More patients in the docetaxel arm discontinued therapy due to toxicity (P < .001). Significantly more treatment-related grade 3 to 4 febrile neutropenia (36.0% v 10.1%), leucopenia (40.3% v 21.0%), infection 25.1% v 13.0%), fever (4.3% v 0%), neuropathy (30.9% v 3.6%), nail changes (7.9% v 0.7%), and edema (6.5% v 0%) were reported with docetaxel.ConclusionThe study failed to demonstrate superiority of any drug in terms of efficacy, but the vinorelbine combination had significantly fewer adverse effects and should be considered as an alternative first-line option.
Publisher
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
Cited by
256 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献