Response of Circulating Tumor Cells to Systemic Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer: Comparison of Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction and Immunocytochemical Techniques

Author:

Smith Brendan M.1,Slade Martin J.1,English Jacqueline1,Graham Helen1,Lüchtenborg Margreet1,Sinnett H. Dudley1,Cross Nicholas C. P.1,Coombes R. Charles1

Affiliation:

1. From the Cancer Research Campaign LaboratoriesDivision of Cancer Cell Biology, and Department of Haematology, Imperial College School of Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital; and Department of Surgery, Charing Cross Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

Abstract

PURPOSE: We previously developed a quantitative system for the detection of cytokeratin 19 (CK-19) transcripts using reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect breast carcinoma cells in blood and bone marrow. The aim of this study was to determine the value of this system in monitoring patients with metastatic disease and to compare it with an established immunocytochemical method. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with progressive, locally advanced, and metastatic breast cancer (all stage IV) who were due to start systemic treatment were recruited. Blood samples were analyzed for CK-19 transcripts using quantitative PCR (QPCR) and immunocytochemistry (ICC) throughout their course of treatment. RESULTS: One hundred forty-five blood samples were obtained from 22 patients over 13 months. Seventy-two (49.6%) of these samples were positive by QPCR, and 56 (42%) of 133 were positive by ICC. Of the 133 specimens analyzed by both techniques, 95 (71.4%) had the same results for each, and of the 71 samples that were positive, 40 (56%) were positive by both methods. The relationship between the number of cells detected and the QPCR values was statistically significant (P < .0001). Of the 25 courses of assessable treatment, 17 (68%) of 25 treatment outcomes (either response or disease progression) were reflected by QPCR measurements, and 12 (57%) of 21 were reflected by ICC. During the course of the study, five patients showed a response, and of these, ICC was in agreement in four cases (80%) and QPCR in three cases (60%). Eighteen courses of treatment resulted in progression of the disease; however, only 15 of these were assessable by ICC. ICC was in agreement in eight (53%) of 15 of these cases, and QPCR in 15 (83%) of 18 cases. CONCLUSION: Circulating carcinoma cells are frequently found in patients with metastatic breast cancer. In the majority of patients, cancer cell numbers as evaluated by QPCR or ICC reflected the outcome of systemic treatment.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3