ASCO Ethical Guidance for the US Oncology Community Where Reproductive Health Care Is Limited by Law

Author:

Spence Rebecca A.1ORCID,Hinyard Leslie J.2ORCID,Jagsi Reshma3ORCID,Jimenez Rachel B.4ORCID,Lopez Ana Maria5ORCID,Chavez-MacGregor Mariana6ORCID,Spector-Bagdady Kayte7,Rosenberg Abby R.8ORCID

Affiliation:

1. American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA

2. Department of Health and Clinical Outcomes Research, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO

3. Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA

4. Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

5. Medical Oncology and Integrative Medicine and Nutritional Sciences, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA

6. Departments of Breast Medical Oncology and Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

7. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI

8. Department of Pediatrics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Abstract

The decision in Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization overturned federal protections for abortion rights, making way for states to enact abortion bans with or without exceptions for the health or life of the pregnant patient. Patient care across many areas of medicine including oncology continues to be affected. Although the change in the legal landscape is widely felt, the core ethical considerations for physicians do not change because of restrictions on the practice of medicine. ASCO offers this guidance to assist US oncologists and institutions who must balance limitations with established ethical duties. This paper articulates principles for cancer care and pregnancy, offers a framework for ethical reflection and action for oncologists who care for pregnant patients, and makes recommendations for individual and institutional action to support evidence-based, patient-centered care in the United States where abortion is illegal or access is limited.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3