Race and clinical outcome in breast cancer in a series with long-term follow-up evaluation.

Author:

Heimann R,Ferguson D,Powers C,Suri D,Weichselbaum R R,Hellman S

Abstract

PURPOSE To compare the outcome of African American (AA) and Caucasian (C) breast cancer patients who had equivalent disease extent and were similarly treated. PATIENTS AND METHODS We compared prognostic characteristics, treatment, and outcome of 1,037 C and 481 AA breast cancer patients treated with mastectomy between 1946 and 1987. The median follow-up duration was 15.6 years. RESULTS During the study period, there was a successive increase in the percent of patients who presented with early breast cancer. Between 1980 and 1987, 35.1% AA versus 47.6% C patients had < or = 2-cm tumors and 50.0% AA versus 61.9% C patients were node-negative, while between 1946 and 1959, 27.7% AA and 31.3% C had < or = 2-cm tumors and 41.5% AA versus 40.4% C patients were node-negative. The treatments were similar during the study period. The 20-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate of AA compared with C patients with node-negative < or = 2-cm, 2.1- to 4-cm, and greater than 4-cm tumors and of patients with one to three and > or = four positive nodes was not significantly different. Equal-size tumors had similar proportion of positive axillary nodes in AA compared with C patients. The DFS for AA patients compared with C patients was similar in the periods 1946 to 1959, 1960 to 1969, and 1970 to 1979, but was lower between 1980 and 1987 (P = .02). In multivariable analysis, race was not a significant variable. CONCLUSION In this large group of uniformly treated breast cancer patients, race was not an independent factor that influenced outcome. The racial differences seen between 1980 and 1987 are likely because of a larger percent of greater than 2-cm and node-positive tumors in AA patients. Education and access to early diagnosis should reduce or eliminate the racial differences seen.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Cited by 57 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3