The Effects of Oncologist Implicit Racial Bias in Racially Discordant Oncology Interactions

Author:

Penner Louis A.1,Dovidio John F.1,Gonzalez Richard1,Albrecht Terrance L.1,Chapman Robert1,Foster Tanina1,Harper Felicity W.K.1,Hagiwara Nao1,Hamel Lauren M.1,Shields Anthony F.1,Gadgeel Shirish1,Simon Michael S.1,Griggs Jennifer J.1,Eggly Susan1

Affiliation:

1. Louis A. Penner, Terrance L. Albrecht, Tanina Foster, Felicity W.K. Harper, Lauren M. Hamel, Anthony F. Shields, Shirish Gadgeel, Michael S. Simon, and Susan Eggly, Wayne State University; Robert Chapman, Henry Ford Health Care System, Detroit; Richard Gonzalez and Jennifer J. Griggs, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; John F. Dovidio, Yale University, New Haven, CT; and Nao Hagiwara, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.

Abstract

Purpose Health providers’ implicit racial bias negatively affects communication and patient reactions to many medical interactions. However, its effects on racially discordant oncology interactions are largely unknown. Thus, we examined whether oncologist implicit racial bias has similar effects in oncology interactions. We further investigated whether oncologist implicit bias negatively affects patients’ perceptions of recommended treatments (i.e., degree of confidence, expected difficulty). We predicted oncologist implicit bias would negatively affect communication, patient reactions to interactions, and, indirectly, patient perceptions of recommended treatments. Methods Participants were 18 non-black medical oncologists and 112 black patients. Oncologists completed an implicit racial bias measure several weeks before video-recorded treatment discussions with new patients. Observers rated oncologist communication and recorded interaction length of time and amount of time oncologists and patients spoke. Following interactions, patients answered questions about oncologists’ patient-centeredness and difficulty remembering contents of the interaction, distress, trust, and treatment perceptions. Results As predicted, oncologists higher in implicit racial bias had shorter interactions, and patients and observers rated these oncologists’ communication as less patient-centered and supportive. Higher implicit bias also was associated with more patient difficulty remembering contents of the interaction. In addition, oncologist implicit bias indirectly predicted less patient confidence in recommended treatments, and greater perceived difficulty completing them, through its impact on oncologists’ communication (as rated by both patients and observers). Conclusion Oncologist implicit racial bias is negatively associated with oncologist communication, patients’ reactions to racially discordant oncology interactions, and patient perceptions of recommended treatments. These perceptions could subsequently directly affect patient-treatment decisions. Thus, implicit racial bias is a likely source of racial treatment disparities and must be addressed in oncology training and practice.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Reference59 articles.

1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2014 National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report. Rockville, MD, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2015

2. Mead H, Cartwright-Smith L, Jones K, et al. Racial and Ethnic Disparities in U.S. Healthcare: A Chartbook. New York, NY, Commonwealth Fund, 2008

3. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2014

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3