Implementation of Precision Oncology in the National Healthcare System: A Statement Proposal Endorsed by Italian Scientific Societies

Author:

Fasola Gianpiero1ORCID,Barducci Maria C.1ORCID,Tozzi Valeria D.2ORCID,Cavanna Luigi34ORCID,Cinieri Saverio56,Perrone Francesco67ORCID,Pinto Carmine8ORCID,Russo Antonio910ORCID,Sapino Anna1112ORCID,Grossi Francesco13ORCID,Aprile Giuseppe14

Affiliation:

1. Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, ASUFC, Udine, Italy

2. Centre for Research on Health and Social Care Management (CERGAS), SDA Bocconi School of Management, Milan, Italy

3. Piacenza General Hospital, AUSL Piacenza, Piacenza, Italy

4. Collegio Italiano dei Primari Oncologi Medici Ospedalieri (CIPOMO), Genova, Italy

5. Complex Medical Oncology Unit, ASL Brindisi Senatore Antonio Perrino Hospital, Brindisi, Italy

6. Associazione Italiana Oncologia Medica (AIOM), Milano, Italy

7. Clinical Trials Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS, Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy

8. Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, AUSL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy

9. Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy

10. Collegio degli Oncologi Medici Universitari (COMU), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy

11. Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy

12. Società Italiana di Anatomia Patologica e Citologia Diagnostica (SIAPeC), Milano, Italy

13. University of Insubria, Varese, Italy

14. Department of Oncology, San Bortolo General Hospital, Vicenza, Italy

Abstract

PURPOSEPrecision oncology (PO) promises positive results for patients. To date, in Italy, the effort to implement PO has been made autonomously by regional health institutions in a top-down fashion. This approach is not very efficient and jeopardizes patients' equal access to PO. Similar outcomes have been recorded in other Western countries. We tested a method of collaboration among professionals, scientific societies, and government institutions to facilitate the delivery of PO innovation to patients' bedsides.METHODWe designed an organizational research project on the basis of a bottom-up approach. We started by observing PO-related activities in five health care authorities (HCAs) in one Italian region. We then compared the issues that emerged with those of three additional HCAs in other Italian regions. Using the results of the initial observation and adopting validated multiple-step consensus methods, we finally derived 14 statements that were approved by the four main scientific societies of oncology and pathology at the national level.RESULTSThe 14 statements addressed the main issues linked to the implementation of PO in clinical practice. The strong professional consensus advocated for prompt adoption within the national healthcare system.CONCLUSIONSThe consensus on the statements that were obtained shows the importance of a synergistic effort among professionals, scientific societies, and health care institutions in defining homogeneous solutions for innovation implementation within the health care system.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3