Characteristics and Survival Outcomes of Patients With Metastatic RET Fusion–Positive Solid Tumors Receiving Non-RET Inhibitor Standards of Care in a Real-World Setting

Author:

Hackshaw Allan1,Fajardo Otto2ORCID,Dafni Urania3ORCID,Gelderblom Hans4ORCID,Garrido Pilar5,Siena Salvatore6ORCID,Taylor Matthew H.7ORCID,Bordogna Walter2,Nikolaidis Christos2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Cancer Research UK, University College London Cancer Trials Centre, London, United Kingdom

2. F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland

3. Frontier Science Foundation Hellas, and School of Health Sciences, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece

4. Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands

5. Department of Medical Oncology, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, IRYCIS (Instituto Ramón y Cajal Investigación Sanitaria), Madrid, Spain

6. Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Universitá degli Studi di Milano, and Niguarda Cancer Center, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy

7. Earle A. Chiles Research Institute, Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, OR

Abstract

PURPOSE RET fusions are oncogenic drivers across different solid tumors. However, the genomic landscape and natural history of patients with RET fusion–positive solid tumors are not well known. We describe the clinical characteristics of RET tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-naïve patients with RET fusion–positive solid tumors (excluding non–small-cell lung cancer [NSCLC]), treated in a real-world setting and assess the prognostic effect of RET fusions. METHODS Data for RET TKI-naïve patients with metastatic solid tumors (excluding NSCLC) who had ≥one Foundation Medicine comprehensive genomic profiling test (January 1, 2011-March 31, 2022) were obtained from a deidentified nationwide (US-based) clinicogenomic database. The primary objective of this study was to compare the overall survival (OS) of patients with RET fusion–positive tumors versus matched patients with RET wild-type ( RET-WT) tumors. Patients with RET-WT solid tumors were matched (4:1) to patients with RET fusion–positive tumors on the basis of preselected covariates. RESULTS The study population included 26 patients in the RET fusion–positive cohort, 7,220 patients in the RET-WT cohort (before matching), and 104 patients in the matched RET-WT cohort. Co-occurring genomic alterations were rare in the RET fusion–positive cohort. Median OS was consistently lower in patients with RET fusion–positive tumors versus those with RET-WT tumors, using three different analyses (hazard ratios, 2.0, 1.7, and 2.2). CONCLUSION These data suggest that RET fusions represent a negative prognostic factor in patients with metastatic solid tumors and highlight the need for wider genomic testing and use of RET-specific TKIs that could improve patient outcomes. Our study also highlights the value of real-world data when studying rare cancers or cancers with rare genomic alterations.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3