Population Variations in the Initial Treatment of Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Author:

Potosky Arnold L.1,Saxman Scott1,Wallace Robert B.1,Lynch Charles F.1

Affiliation:

1. From the Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; and Department of Epidemiology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA

Abstract

Purpose Dissemination of recommended therapies for non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have not been described comprehensively. We report the patterns of initial therapy focusing on the investigation of differences in receipt of recommended therapies according to multiple clinical and nonclinical patient characteristics. Methods A population-based random sample of newly diagnosed NSCLC patients diagnosed in 10 separate geographic areas was collected in 1996 (n = 898). Data were obtained from medical records. Multiple logistic regression was used to assess the use of recommended therapies. Results Overall, 52% of NSCLC patients received recommended therapy. Approximately 69%, 48%, and 41% of patients with stages I and II, III, or IV NSCLC received recommended therapy, respectively. For all stages combined, the use of recommended therapy was significantly inversely associated with age and stage at diagnosis. Recommended therapy also was more common in white versus black patients, and in married versus single patients. Stage-specific analyses revealed a significant decline in the use of recommended surgery with increasing age at diagnosis for early-stage NSCLC only, and a significantly lower use of recommended therapy (primarily chemoradiotherapy) for stage III black and Hispanic patients compared with white patients. Conclusion The overall use of recommended therapies for NSCLC is low. Large variations exist in the use of such therapies according to age, race or ethnicity, and marital status. Research combining medical record reviews with other sources of data is needed to better understand the contributions of both patient preferences and physician judgment to these treatment variations.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3