Recommendations for the Return of Research Results to Study Participants and Guardians: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group

Author:

Fernandez Conrad V.1,Ruccione Kathleen1,Wells Robert J.1,Long Jay B.1,Pelletier Wendy1,Hooke Mary C.1,Pentz Rebecca D.1,Noll Robert B.1,Baker Justin N.1,O'Leary Maura1,Reaman Gregory1,Adamson Peter C.1,Joffe Steven1

Affiliation:

1. Conrad V. Fernandez, Izaak Walton Killam Health Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia; Wendy Pelletier, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Kathleen Ruccione, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles; Jay B. Long, Jonathan Jaques Children's Cancer, Miller Children's Hospital Long Beach, Long Beach, CA; Robert J. Wells, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Mary C. Hooke, University of Minnesota School of Nursing, Minneapolis, MN; Rebecca D....

Abstract

PurposeThe Children's Oncology Group (COG) strongly supports the widely recognized principle that research participants should be offered a summary of study results. The mechanism by which to do so in a cooperative research group setting has not been previously described.MethodsOn the basis of a review of the available empirical and theoretic literature and on iterative, multidisciplinary discussion, a COG Return of Results Task Force (RRTF) offered detailed recommendations for the return of results to research study participants.ResultsThe RRTF established guidelines for the notification of research participants and/or their parents/guardians about the availability of research results, a mechanism for and timing of sharing results via registration on the COG public Web site, the scope of the research to be shared, the target audience, and a process for creating and vetting lay summaries of study results. The RRTF recognized the challenges in adequately conveying complex scientific results to audiences with varying levels of health literacy and recommended that particularly sensitive or complex results be returned using direct personal contact. The RRTF also recommended evaluation of the cost, effectiveness, and impact of sharing results.ConclusionThese recommendations provide a framework for the offering and returning of results to participants. They can be used by individual investigators, multi-investigator research collaboratives, and large cooperative groups.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3