A Role for Common Genomic Variants in the Assessment of Familial Breast Cancer

Author:

Sawyer Sarah1,Mitchell Gillian1,McKinley Joanne1,Chenevix-Trench Georgia1,Beesley Jonathan1,Chen Xiao Qing1,Bowtell David1,Trainer Alison H.1,Harris Marion1,Lindeman Geoffrey J.1,James Paul A.1

Affiliation:

1. Sarah Sawyer, Gillian Mitchell, Joanne McKinley, Alison H. Trainer, and Paul A. James, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre; Alison H. Trainer and Geoffrey J. Lindeman, Royal Melbourne Hospital; Gillian Mitchell, David Bowtell, Geoffrey J. Lindeman, and Paul A. James, University of Melbourne; Marion Harris, Monash Medical Centre; Geoffrey J. Lindeman, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research; Paul A. James, Victorian Clinical Genetics Service, Melbourne, Victoria; and Georgia Chenevix-Trench,...

Abstract

Purpose Genome-wide association studies have identified common genomic variants associated with increased susceptibility to breast cancer. In the general population, the risk associated with these known variants seems insufficient to inform clinical management. Their contribution to the development of familial breast cancer is less clear. Patients and Methods We studied 1,143 women with breast cancer who had completed BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation screening as a result of a high risk for hereditary breast cancer. Genotyping of 22 breast cancer–associated genomic variants was performed. A polygenic risk score (PRS), calculated as the sum of the log odds ratios for each allele, was compared with the same metric in 892 controls from the Australian Ovarian Cancer Study. The clinical features associated with the high and low ends of the polygenic risk distribution were compared. Results Women affected by familial breast cancer had a highly significant excess of risk alleles compared with controls (P = 1.0 × 10−16). Polygenic risk (measured by the PRS) was greater in women who tested negative for a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation compared with mutation carriers (P = 2.3 × 10−6). Non-BRCA1/2 women in the top quartile of the polygenic risk distribution were more likely to have had early-onset breast cancer (< 30 years of age, odds ratio [OR]= 3.37, P = .03) and had a higher rate of second breast cancer (OR 1.96, P = .02) compared with women with low polygenic risk. Conclusion Genetic testing for common risk variants in women undergoing assessment for familial breast cancer may identify a distinct group of high-risk women in whom the role of risk-reducing interventions should be explored.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3