Multicenter Randomized Trial of Centralized Nurse-Led Telephone-Based Care Coordination to Improve Outcomes After Surgical Resection for Colorectal Cancer: The CONNECT Intervention
-
Published:2013-10-01
Issue:28
Volume:31
Page:3585-3591
-
ISSN:0732-183X
-
Container-title:Journal of Clinical Oncology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:JCO
Author:
Young Jane M.1, Butow Phyllis N.1, Walsh Jennifer1, Durcinoska Ivana1, Dobbins Timothy A.1, Rodwell Laura1, Harrison James D.1, White Kate1, Gilmore Andrew1, Hodge Bruce1, Hicks Henry1, Smith Stephen1, O'Connor Geoff1, Byrne Christopher M.1, Meagher Alan P.1, Jancewicz Stephen1, Sutherland Andrew1, Ctercteko Grahame1, Pathma-Nathan Nimalan1, Curtin Austin1, Townend David1, Abraham Ned S.1, Longfield Greg1, Rangiah David1, Young Christopher J.1, Eyers Anthony1, Lee Peter1, Fisher Dean1, Solomon Michael J.1
Affiliation:
1. Jane M. Young, Phyllis N. Butow, Jennifer Walsh, Ivana Durcinoska, Timothy A. Dobbins, Laura Rodwell, James D. Harrison, Kate White, Christopher M. Byrne, Christopher J. Young, and Michael J. Solomon, University of Sydney; Jane M. Young, Jennifer Walsh, Ivana Durcinoska, James D. Harrison, and Michael J. Solomon, Surgical Outcomes Research Centre, Sydney Local Health District; Christopher M. Byrne, Christopher J. Young, Anthony Eyers, Peter Lee, and Michael J. Solomon, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital; Alan...
Abstract
Purpose To investigate the effectiveness of a centralized, nurse-delivered telephone-based service to improve care coordination and patient-reported outcomes after surgery for colorectal cancer. Patients and Methods Patients with a newly diagnosed colorectal cancer were randomly assigned to the CONNECT intervention or usual care. Intervention-group patients received standardized calls from the centrally based nurse 3 and 10 days and 1, 3, and 6 months after discharge from hospital. Unmet supportive care needs, experience of care coordination, unplanned readmissions, emergency department presentations, distress, and quality of life (QOL) were assessed by questionnaire at 1, 3, and 6 months. Results Of 775 patients treated at 23 public and private hospitals in Australia, 387 were randomly assigned to the intervention group and 369 to the control group. There were no significant differences between groups in unmet supportive care needs, but these were consistently low in both groups at both follow-up time points. There were no differences between the groups in emergency department presentations (10.8% v 13.8%; P = .2) or unplanned hospital readmissions (8.6% v 10.5%; P = .4) at 1 month. By 6 months, 25.6% of intervention-group patients had reported an unplanned readmission compared with 27.9% of controls (P = .5). There were no significant differences in experience of care coordination, distress, or QOL between groups at any follow-up time point. Conclusion This trial failed to demonstrate substantial benefit of a centralized system to provide standardized, telephone follow-up for postoperative patients with colorectal cancer. Future interventions could investigate a more tailored approach.
Publisher
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
Subject
Cancer Research,Oncology
Reference26 articles.
1. A New Health System for the 21st Century 2001 Institute of Medicine: Crossing the Quality Chasm Washington, DC National Academies Press 2. National Service Improvement Framework for Cancer 2004 National Health Priority Action Council Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia National Health Priority Action Council 3. Learning From the Past, Informing the Future: Continuity and Coordination of Care—Improving the Cancer Journey 2005 Breast Services Enhancement Program Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Cancer and Palliative Care Programs Branch, Victorian Government Department of Human Services
Cited by
95 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|