Clinical Utility and User Perceptions of a Digital System for Electronic Patient-Reported Symptom Monitoring During Routine Cancer Care: Findings From the PRO-TECT Trial

Author:

Basch Ethan1ORCID,Stover Angela M.1ORCID,Schrag Deborah2,Chung Arlene1,Jansen Jennifer1,Henson Sydney1,Carr Philip1,Ginos Brenda3,Deal Allison1ORCID,Spears Patricia A.1,Jonsson Mattias1,Bennett Antonia V.1,Mody Gita1ORCID,Thanarajasingam Gita4,Rogak Lauren J.5,Reeve Bryce B.6ORCID,Snyder Claire7,Kottschade Lisa A.8ORCID,Charlot Marjory1ORCID,Weiss Anna9,Bruner Deborah10ORCID,Dueck Amylou C.3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC

2. Dana Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, MA

3. Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ

4. Mayo Clinic, Division of Hematology, Rochester, MN

5. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

6. Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC

7. Johns Hopkins Schools of Medicine and Public Health, Baltimore, MD

8. Mayo Clinic, Department of Medical Oncology, Rochester, MN

9. Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA

10. Emory University, Atlanta, GA

Abstract

PURPOSE There is increasing interest in implementing digital systems for remote monitoring of patients’ symptoms during routine oncology practice. Information is limited about the clinical utility and user perceptions of these systems. METHODS PRO-TECT is a multicenter trial evaluating implementation of electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) among adults with advanced and metastatic cancers receiving treatment at US community oncology practices (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03249090 ). Questions derived from the Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) are administered weekly by web or automated telephone system, with alerts to nurses for severe or worsening symptoms. To elicit user feedback, surveys were administered to participating patients and clinicians. RESULTS Among 496 patients across 26 practices, the majority found the system and questions easy to understand (95%), easy to use (93%), and relevant to their care (91%). Most patients reported that PRO information was used by their clinicians for care (70%), improved discussions with clinicians (73%), made them feel more in control of their own care (77%), and would recommend the system to other patients (89%). Scores for most patient feedback questions were significantly positively correlated with weekly PRO completion rates in both univariate and multivariable analyses. Among 57 nurses, most reported that PRO information was helpful for clinical documentation (79%), increased efficiency of patient discussions (84%), and was useful for patient care (75%). Among 39 oncologists, most found PRO information useful (91%), with 65% using PROs to guide patient discussions sometimes or often and 65% using PROs to make treatment decisions sometimes or often. CONCLUSION These findings support the clinical utility and value of implementing digital systems for monitoring PROs, including the PRO-CTCAE, in routine cancer care.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3