Survival in Patients With Brain Metastases: Summary Report on the Updated Diagnosis-Specific Graded Prognostic Assessment and Definition of the Eligibility Quotient

Author:

Sperduto Paul W.1ORCID,Mesko Shane2ORCID,Li Jing2,Cagney Daniel3,Aizer Ayal3ORCID,Lin Nancy U.3ORCID,Nesbit Eric4ORCID,Kruser Tim J.4,Chan Jason5ORCID,Braunstein Steve5ORCID,Lee Jessica6,Kirkpatrick John P.6,Breen Will7ORCID,Brown Paul D.7ORCID,Shi Diana8ORCID,Shih Helen A.8ORCID,Soliman Hany9,Sahgal Arjun9,Shanley Ryan10ORCID,Sperduto William A.6,Lou Emil10ORCID,Everett Ashlyn11ORCID,Boggs Drexell H.11ORCID,Masucci Laura12,Roberge David12,Remick Jill13,Plichta Kristin14,Buatti John M.14ORCID,Jain Supriya15ORCID,Gaspar Laurie E.15,Wu Cheng-Chia16,Wang Tony J.C.16ORCID,Bryant John17,Chuong Michael17ORCID,An Yi18ORCID,Chiang Veronica18ORCID,Nakano Toshimichi19ORCID,Aoyama Hidefumi20,Mehta Minesh P.17ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Minneapolis Radiation Oncology and University of Minnesota Gamma Knife Center, Minneapolis, MN

2. MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

3. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

4. Northwestern University, Chicago, IL

5. University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

6. Duke University, Durham, NC

7. Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

8. Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA

9. Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

10. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN

11. University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL

12. Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

13. University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD

14. University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA

15. University of Colorado, Denver, CO

16. Columbia University, New York, NY

17. Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL

18. Yale University, New Haven, CT

19. University of Niigata, Niigata, Japan

20. Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan

Abstract

PURPOSE Conventional wisdom has rendered patients with brain metastases ineligible for clinical trials for fear that poor survival could mask the benefit of otherwise promising treatments. Our group previously published the diagnosis-specific Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA). Updates with larger contemporary cohorts using molecular markers and newly identified prognostic factors have been published. The purposes of this work are to present all the updated indices in a single report to guide treatment choice, stratify research, and define an eligibility quotient to expand eligibility. METHODS A multi-institutional database of 6,984 patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases underwent multivariable analyses of prognostic factors and treatments associated with survival for each primary site. Significant factors were used to define the updated GPA. GPAs of 4.0 and 0.0 correlate with the best and worst prognoses, respectively. RESULTS Significant prognostic factors varied by diagnosis and new prognostic factors were identified. Those factors were incorporated into the updated GPA with robust separation ( P < .01) between subgroups. Survival has improved, but varies widely by GPA for patients with non–small-cell lung, breast, melanoma, GI, and renal cancer with brain metastases from 7-47 months, 3-36 months, 5-34 months, 3-17 months, and 4-35 months, respectively. CONCLUSION Median survival varies widely and our ability to estimate survival for patients with brain metastases has improved. The updated GPA (available free at brainmetgpa.com) provides an accurate tool with which to estimate survival, individualize treatment, and stratify clinical trials. Instead of excluding patients with brain metastases, enrollment should be encouraged and those trials should be stratified by the GPA to ensure those trials make appropriate comparisons. Furthermore, we recommend the expansion of eligibility to allow for the enrollment of patients with previously treated brain metastases who have a 50% or greater probability of an additional year of survival (eligibility quotient > 0.50).

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3