First-Line Nivolumab Plus Relatlimab Versus Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma: An Indirect Treatment Comparison Using RELATIVITY-047 and CheckMate 067 Trial Data

Author:

Long Georgina V.1ORCID,Lipson Evan J.2ORCID,Hodi F. Stephen3,Ascierto Paolo A.4ORCID,Larkin James5ORCID,Lao Christopher6,Grob Jean-Jacques7ORCID,Ejzykowicz Flavia8,Moshyk Andriy8ORCID,Garcia-Horton Viviana9,Zhou Zheng-Yi9ORCID,Xin Yiqiao9ORCID,Palaia Jennell8,McDonald Laura8,Keidel Sarah8,Salvatore Anthony8,Patel Divya8,Sakkal Leon A.8ORCID,Tawbi Hussein10ORCID,Schadendorf Dirk111213ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, NSW, Australia

2. The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD

3. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

4. Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Italy

5. The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom

6. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

7. Aix-Marseille University, Hôpital de la Timone, Marseille, France

8. Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ

9. Analysis Group, Inc, Boston, MA

10. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

11. University of Essen and the German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site, Essen, Germany

12. National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT-West), Campus Essen, Essen, Germany

13. University Alliance Ruhr, Research Center One Health, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany

Abstract

PURPOSE Nivolumab plus relatlimab and nivolumab plus ipilimumab have been approved for advanced melanoma on the basis of the phase II/III RELATIVITY-047 and phase III CheckMate 067 trials, respectively. As no head-to-head trial comparing these regimens exists, an indirect treatment comparison was conducted using patient-level data from each trial. METHODS Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) adjusted for baseline characteristic differences. Minimum follow-ups (RELATIVITY-047, 33 months; CheckMate 067, 36 months) were selected to best align assessments. Outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), confirmed objective response rate (cORR), and melanoma-specific survival (MSS) per investigator; overall survival (OS); and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). A Cox regression model compared PFS, OS, and MSS. A logistic regression model compared cORRs. Subgroup analyses were exploratory. RESULTS After IPTW, key baseline characteristics were balanced for nivolumab plus relatlimab (n = 339) and nivolumab plus ipilimumab (n = 297). Nivolumab plus relatlimab demonstrated similar PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.08 [95% CI, 0.88 to 1.33]), cORR (odds ratio, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.73 to 1.14]), OS (HR, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.75 to 1.19]), and MSS (HR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.67 to 1.12]) to nivolumab plus ipilimumab. Subgroup comparisons showed larger numerical differences favoring nivolumab plus ipilimumab with acral melanoma, BRAF-mutant melanoma, and lactate dehydrogenase >2 × upper limit of normal, but were limited by small samples. Nivolumab plus relatlimab was associated with fewer grade 3-4 TRAEs (23% v 61%) and any-grade TRAEs leading to discontinuation (17% v 41%). CONCLUSION Nivolumab plus relatlimab demonstrated similar efficacy to nivolumab plus ipilimumab in the overall population, including most—but not all—subgroups, and improved safety in patients with untreated advanced melanoma. Results should be interpreted with caution.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3