Breast Cancer Screening Interval: Effect on Rate of Late-Stage Disease at Diagnosis and Overall Survival

Author:

Zuley Margarita L.1ORCID,Bandos Andriy I.2,Duffy Stephen W.3ORCID,Logue Durwin4,Bhargava Rohit5ORCID,McAuliffe Priscilla F.6ORCID,Brufsky Adam M.7ORCID,Nishikawa Robert M.4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Radiology, Division of Breast Imaging, School of Medicine & University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA

2. Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA

3. Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, England

4. Imaging Research, Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA

5. Department of Pathology and Pathology at Magee-Womens Hospital of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA

6. Department of Surgery and Breast Surgical Oncology at Magee-Womens Hospital of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA

7. Division of Hematology/Oncology, School of Medicine & University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA

Abstract

PURPOSE Controversy continues regarding the effect of screening mammography on breast cancer outcomes. We evaluated late-stage cancer rate and overall survival (OS) for different screening intervals using a real-world institutional research data mart. METHODS Patients having both a cancer registry record of new breast cancer diagnosis and prediagnosis screening history between 2004 and 2019 were identified from our institutional research breast data mart. Time interval between the two screening mammograms immediately preceding diagnosis and the time to cancer diagnosis were determined. Screening interval was deemed annual if ≤15 months, biennial if >15 and ≤27 months, intermittent if >27 months, and baseline if only one prediagnosis screen was known. The primary end point was late-stage cancer (TNM stage IIB or worse), and the secondary end point was OS. The association of screening interval and late-stage cancer was analyzed using multivariable logistic regression adjusting for prediagnosis characteristics. Proportional hazards regression was used for survival analysis. Potential lead time was analyzed using survival from a uniform fixed time point. RESULTS In total, 8,145 patients with breast cancer had prediagnosis screening mammography in the timeframe. The percentage of late-stage cancers diagnosed increased significantly with screening interval with 9%, 14%, and 19% late stages for annual, biennial, and intermittent groups ( P < .001), respectively. The trend persisted regardless of age, race, and menopausal status. Biennial and intermittent groups had substantially worse OS than the annual screened group, with relative hazards of 1.42 (95% CI, 1.11 to 1.82) and 2.69 (95% CI, 2.11 to 3.43), respectively, and 1.39 (95% CI, 1.08 to 1.78) and 2.01 (95% CI, 1.58 to 2.55) after adjustment for potential lead time. CONCLUSION Annual mammographic screening was associated with lower risk of late-stage cancer and better OS across clinical and demographic subgroups. Our study suggests benefit of annual screening for women 40 years and older.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3