Quality Assessment of Genetic Markers Used for Therapy Stratification

Author:

Ambros I.M.1,Benard J.1,Boavida M.1,Bown N.1,Caron H.1,Combaret V.1,Couturier J.1,Darnfors C.1,Delattre O.1,Freeman-Edward J.1,Gambini C.1,Gross N.1,Hattinger C.M.1,Luegmayr A.1,Lunec J.1,Martinsson T.1,Mazzocco K.1,Navarro S.1,Noguera R.1,O’Neill S.1,Pötschger U.1,Rumpler S.1,Speleman F.1,Tonini G.P.1,Valent A.1,Van Roy N.1,Amann G.1,De Bernardi B.1,Kogner P.1,Ladenstein R.1,Michon J.1,Pearson A.D.J.1,Ambros P.F.1

Affiliation:

1. From the Children’s Cancer Research Institute, St Anna Kinderspital, and Department of Pathology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Unité des Marqueurs Génétiques des Cancers, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; Unité d’Oncologie Moléculaire, Centre Léon-Bérard, Lyon; Service de Génétique and Département de Pédiatrie, Section Médicale; and Institut Nationale de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U509 Pathologie Moléculaire des Cancers, Section de Recherche, Institut Curie, Paris, France; Centro de...

Abstract

Purpose: Therapy stratification based on genetic markers is becoming increasingly important, which makes commitment to the highest possible reliability of the involved markers mandatory. In neuroblastic tumors, amplification of the MYCN gene is an unequivocal marker that indicates aggressive tumor behavior and is consequently used for therapy stratification. To guarantee reliable and standardized quality of genetic features, a quality-assessment study was initiated by the European Neuroblastoma Quality Assessment (ENQUA; connected to International Society of Pediatric Oncology) Group. Materials and Methods: One hundred thirty-seven coded specimens from 17 tumors were analyzed in 11 European national/regional reference laboratories using molecular techniques, in situ hybridization, and flow and image cytometry. Tumor samples with divergent results were re-evaluated. Results: Three hundred fifty-two investigations were performed, which resulted in 23 divergent findings, 17 of which were judged as errors after re-evaluation. MYCN analyses determined by Southern blot and in situ hybridization led to 3.7% and 4% of errors, respectively. Tumor cell content was not indicated in 32% of the samples, and 11% of seemingly correct MYCN results were based on the investigation of normal cells (eg, Schwann cells). Thirty-eight investigations were considered nonassessable. Conclusion: This study demonstrated the importance of revealing the difficulties and limitations for each technique and problems in interpreting results, which are crucial for therapeutic decisions. Moreover, it led to the formulation of guidelines that are applicable to all kinds of tumors and that contain the standardization of techniques, including the exact determination of the tumor cell content. Finally, the group has developed a common terminology for molecular-genetic results.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3