Needle aspiration techniques in preoperative selection of patients with thyroid nodules: a long-term study.

Author:

Carpi A,Ferrari E,Toni M G,Sagripanti A,Nicolini A,Di Coscio G

Abstract

PURPOSE Long-term evaluation of the combination of two needle aspiration techniques (NAT) (fine-needle aspiration [FNA] and aspiration needle biopsy [ANB]) in performing an efficient preoperative selection of palpable thyroid nodules. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eight years of extensive use of surgery for the detection of thyroid cancer was compared with 12 years of preoperative selection of by NAT. RESULTS A total of 1,140 operations were performed from 1972 to 1979, and 35 malignant nodules were discovered (3.1%). Five thousand four hundred three patients were examined by NAT from 1980 to 1992; 483 (9%) underwent surgery and 158 malignant nodules were excised. The number of malignant nodules identified by NAT was 166 (eight were not excised) (3.1% of the total population examined). The principal clinical and pathologic features were similar in both groups. ANB yielded a definite benign diagnosis in 88 patients with inadequate FNA findings, it correctly identified four malignant nodules diagnosed as benign by FNA, it showed a macrofollicular component in 115 nodules diagnosed by FNA as microfollicular nodules, and it significantly changed the predictive value of 79 suspicions FNA diagnoses. CONCLUSION Introduction of NAT reduced the number of operations for palpable thyroid nodules from 143 to 40 per year and increased from four to 13 the number of malignant nodules excised without any change in the overall incidence of malignant nodules. The combination of ANB to FNA significantly contributed to the high and efficient preoperative patient selection, principally by reducing the number of indeterminate or suspicious, as well as false-negative, preoperative FNA diagnoses.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Cited by 72 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3