Cetuximab plus irinotecan for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Safety analysis of 800 patients in a randomized phase III trial (EPIC)

Author:

Abubakr Y.1,Eng C.1,Wong L.1,Pautret V.1,Scheithauer W.1,Maurel J.1,Kroening H.1,Lutz M.1,Zubel A.1,Sobrero A.1

Affiliation:

1. Florida Oncology Associates, Jacksonville, FL; M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Bristol-Myers Squibb, BraineI’Alleud, Belgium; Division of Medical Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; Vienna Medical School, Vienna, Austria; Stadisches Klinikum, Magdeburg, Germany; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany; Caritasklinik, Saarbruecken, Germany; Scott and White Memorial Hospital, Temple, TX; Ospedale S Martino

Abstract

3556 Background: EPIC is a randomized phase III study comparing cetuximab plus irinotecan to irinotecan in second-line metastatic, EGFR-expressing mCRC patients (pts) (target N=1,300 pts). Following an independent Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) review of 400 pts., the pooled safety data was presented at ASCO 2005 (#3580). The DSMB has recently reviewed safety data on the first 800 patients. Methods: Patients with EGFR-expressing mCRC who had failed first-line oxaliplatin in combination with a fluoropyrimidine and an ECOG performance status ≤ 2 were randomized to either Arm A (cetuximab 400 mg/m2 followed by 250 mg/ m2 weekly and irinotecan 350 mg/ m2 q 3 weeks) or to Arm B (irinotecan 350 mg/ m2 q 3 weeks). A pooled safety analysis is presented. Results: Eight hundred patients were randomized from May 2003 to March 2005 in Europe, Australia, Asia, and the US: 309 women and 491 men, with a median age of 61 years (range 21–90) and ECOG performance status (PS) of: 0= 53%, 1= 42%, 2= 5%. Seventeen pts received no study therapy and are excluded from the analysis. A total of 3,629 chemotherapy cycles were administered to the 783 pts with a median of 4 cycles per pt (range 1–23). Four (0.5%) subjects experienced severe infusion reactions: 2 grade 3 and 2 grade 4, none were fatal. In this pooled analysis, 59 deaths occurred within 30 days of last study therapy: 45 disease-related, 5 study drug related, 6 due to other causes, and 3 with unknown etiology. A summary table of adverse events (AE’s) is included. Conclusions: The DSMB raised no concerns after reviewing the safety data from 800 pts. In this pooled analysis characteristic toxicities of cetuximab and irinotecan do not appear to be increased, incidences and severities are similar to the earlier safety report based on the initial 400 patients. The study is currently nearing completion of accrual. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3