Safety and efficacy of oxaliplatin/fluoropyrimidine regimens with or without bevacizumab as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Final analysis of the TREE-Study

Author:

Hochster H. S.1,Hart L. L.1,Ramanathan R. K.1,Hainsworth J. D.1,Hedrick E. E.1,Childs B. H.1

Affiliation:

1. New York University, New York, NY; Florida Cancer Specialists, Ft. Myers, FL; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Sarah Cannon Cancer Center, Nashville, TN; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA; Sanofi-Aventis, Bridgewater, NJ

Abstract

3510 Background: The addition of bevacizumab (bev) to fluorouracil-based combination chemotherapy results in statistically significant improvement in survival among patients (pts) with mCRC. This randomized, multicenter trial was designed to assess the safety, tolerability and efficacy of each of three oxaliplatin (OX) plus bolus (b), infusional, or oral fluoropyrimidine (FP) regimens without (TREE1 cohort) or with (TREE2 cohort) bev for 1st line tx of mCRC. Methods: Eligibility included age ≥ 18 years, measurable, untreated mCRC, ECOG performance status ≤1. Primary endpoint: incidence of grade (gr) 3–4 toxicities (tox) on each arm during the 1st 12 weeks of therapy; secondary endpoints: ORR, TTP, OS. Regimens TREE-1: FOLFOX: OX 85mg/m2, leucovorin (LV) 350mg, 5-FU bolus 400mg/m2 and 2400mg/m2 CIV over 46 hours ; bFOL : OX 85mg/m2 days (d) 1&15, LV 20 mg/m2 and bolus 5-FU 500mg/m2 d 1,8,15 q 4 wks; CapeOx: OX 130 mg/m2 d 1, Capecitabine 1000–850 mg/m2 bid for 14 d. In TREE-2 bev 5 mg/kg q14 or 7.5 q 21 d was added. Results: 147 pts were treated in TREE1 and 213 treated in TREE2. Overall, incidence of any gr 3–4 toxicity (TREE1 vs. TREE2 respectively) = FOLFOX 75% vs. 66%, bFOL 42% vs. 59%, CapeOx 73% vs. 54%. Addition of bev in TREE2 caused more gr 3–4 hypertension, impaired wound healing, and bowel perforation in each arm. Confirmed ITT ORR (TREE1 vs TREE2 respectively) = FOLFOX 41% vs.52%, bFOL 20% vs.39%, CapeOx 27% vs. 46%. Median TTP (months) + 95% CI (TREE1 vs TREE2 respectively) = FOLFOX 8.7 (6.5, 9.8) vs. 9.9 (7.9, 11.7), bFOL 6.9 (4.2, 8.0) vs. 8.3 (6.6, 9.9), CapeOx 5.9 (5.1, 7.4) vs.10.3 (8.6, 12.5). Probability of survival at 18 months (TREE1 vs. TREE2 respectively) = FOLFOX 53% vs. 63%, bFOL 50% vs. 63%, CapeOx 49% vs. 68%. As of January 9, 2006, 56 TREE1 pts (38%) and 122 TREE2 pts (57%) are alive. Conclusions: These data demonstrate these three Ox/FP regimens to be tolerable and effective. Addition of bev to Ox/FP regimens improves response rate and TTP with acceptable tolerability, and no unexpected toxicity. [Table: see text]

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3