Surgical staging of uterine cancer: Randomized phase III trial of laparoscopy vs laparotomy—A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study (GOG): Preliminary results

Author:

Walker J. L.1,Piedmonte M.1,Spirtos N.1,Eisenkop S.1,Schlaerth J.1,Mannel R. S.1,Spiegel G.1

Affiliation:

1. Oklahoma Univ of Health Sci Ctr, Oklahoma City, OK; GOG Statistical and Data Center, Buffalo, NY; University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV; Encino-Tarzana Regional Medical Center, Tarzana, CA; Pacific Gynecologic Specialists, Pasadena, CA; University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK; St. Thomas Hospital, London, United Kingdom

Abstract

5010 Background: Feasibility of laparoscopy has been demonstrated, but the toxicity, staging, and survival has not been adequately compared to the traditional open approach. A randomized Phase III trial of 2616 patients was conducted by the GOG from 5/1996 to 9/2005. QOL and complications of surgery were previously reported at SGO. FIGO pathologic staging is the basis of this report. Methods: Clinical Stage I-IIA uterine cancer were eligible, consenting to either technique. The randomization procedures yielded two on laparoscopy arm for every one on the laparotomy arm. Scope participants were required to undergo laparotomy if the complete surgical staging was not feasible, or for resection of cancer. The staging results include: FIGO surgical stage, peritoneal cytology, number of nodes per site, and percent positive nodes at each location: right pelvic, left pelvic, right para-aortic, left para-aortic. Results: 2616 were randomized, 403 were excluded for this analysis: 84 ineligible, 76 sarcoma, 198 incomplete data, 45 were stage IV, leaving 2213 evaluable for lymph node staging of endometrial carcinoma (781 open:1432 scope). Conversion to laparotomy from laparoscopy occurred in 23.7%. Positive or suspicious cytology was found in 5.6% of laparotomy and 7.8% of laparoscopy participants (p = 0.055 n.s.). Pelvic nodes were documented (R 98.8% vs 98.9%, L 98.5% vs 98.1% n.s.) and positive pelvics (any positive 8.8% vs 8.7%; R 5.5% vs 5.8%; L 6.9% vs 6.1% n.s.) were similar. Laparoscopic surgical staging cases were less likely to have para-aortic nodes sampled (L 91.3% vs 85.0% p < 0.001; R 96.0% vs 92.5% P = 0.001), but positve nodes were no different (any positive PA 5.0% vs 4.5%; R 4.1%, 3.4%; L 2.3%, 2.7% n.s.). Final FIGO Staging results (III A: 5.5% vs 5.7% n.s.& IIIC: 9.3% vs 9.5% n.s.) were the same by randomization arm. Conclusion: These results demonstrate that laparoscopic surgical staging of endometrial cancer can be completed in 76.3%. No difference in postive cytology, node positivity rate, or FIGO stage could be attributed to the laparoscopic approach. Conversion to laparotomy is advised when incomplete staging results would yield inadequate information for treatment planning. NCI Funding: UO1CA65221, CA 27469. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Cited by 28 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3