Online Medical Misinformation in Cancer: Distinguishing Fact From Fiction

Author:

Teplinsky Eleonora1,Ponce Sara Beltrán2ORCID,Drake Emily K.3ORCID,Garcia Ann Meredith4,Loeb Stacy5ORCID,van Londen G.J.6ORCID,Teoh Deanna7ORCID,Thompson Michael8ORCID,Schapira Lidia9ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. Valley-Mount Sinai Comprehensive Cancer Care; Valley Health System, Paramus, NJ

2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI

3. Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

4. Section of Medical Oncology, Dagupan Doctors Villaflor Memorial Hospital, Dagupan City, Philippines

5. Department of Urology and Population Health, New York University and Manhattan Veterans Affairs, New York, NY

6. Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA

7. Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN

8. Aurora Cancer Care, Advocate Aurora Health, Milwaukee, WI

9. Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA

Abstract

It is without question that the Internet has democratized access to medical information, with estimates that 70% of the American population use it as a resource, particularly for cancer-related information. Such unfettered access to information has led to an increase in health misinformation. Fortunately, the data indicate that health care professionals remain among the most trusted information resources. Therefore, understanding how the Internet has changed engagement with health information and facilitated the spread of misinformation is an important task and challenge for cancer clinicians. In this review, we perform a meta-synthesis of qualitative data and point toward empirical evidence that characterizes misinformation in medicine, specifically in oncology. We present this as a call to action for all clinicians to become more active in ongoing efforts to combat misinformation in oncology.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Oncology (nursing),Health Policy,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3