Long-Term Outcomes With Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab or Nivolumab Alone Versus Ipilimumab in Patients With Advanced Melanoma

Author:

Wolchok Jedd D.1ORCID,Chiarion-Sileni Vanna2ORCID,Gonzalez Rene3,Grob Jean-Jacques4ORCID,Rutkowski Piotr5ORCID,Lao Christopher D.6,Cowey C. Lance7,Schadendorf Dirk8ORCID,Wagstaff John9ORCID,Dummer Reinhard10ORCID,Ferrucci Pier Francesco11ORCID,Smylie Michael12,Butler Marcus O.13ORCID,Hill Andrew14,Márquez-Rodas Ivan15ORCID,Haanen John B. A. G.16ORCID,Guidoboni Massimo17,Maio Michele18ORCID,Schöffski Patrick19ORCID,Carlino Matteo S.20,Lebbé Céleste21ORCID,McArthur Grant22ORCID,Ascierto Paolo A.23ORCID,Daniels Gregory A.24ORCID,Long Georgina V.25ORCID,Bas Tuba26,Ritchings Corey26ORCID,Larkin James27ORCID,Hodi F. Stephen28ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY

2. Venteo Institute of Oncology IOV–IRCCS, Padua, Italy

3. University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO

4. Aix-Marseille University, APHM Timone France, Marseille, France

5. Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Institute of Oncology Center, Warsaw, Poland

6. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

7. Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas, TX

8. University of Essen, Essen, and German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany

9. The College of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom

10. Universitäts Spital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland

11. European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy

12. Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

13. Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

14. Tasman Oncology Research, Southport, Queensland, Australia

15. Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Madrid, Spain

16. Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

17. Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori IRCCS, Meldola, Italy

18. Center for Immuno-Oncology, University Hospital of Siena, Siena, Italy

19. University Hospitals Leuven, Department of General Medical Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

20. Westmead and Blacktown Hospitals, University of Sydney, Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, Australia

21. Université de Paris, Department of Dermatology and CIC, AP-HP Hôpital Saint Louis, INSERM U976, Paris, France

22. Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Australia

23. Melanoma Cancer Immunotherapy and Innovative Therapy Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Italy

24. UC San Diego Health – La Jolla, La Jolla, CA

25. Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, and Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, Australia

26. Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ

27. The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom

28. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

Abstract

PURPOSE In the phase III CheckMate 067 trial, durable clinical benefit was demonstrated previously with nivolumab plus ipilimumab and nivolumab alone versus ipilimumab. Here, we report 6.5-year efficacy and safety outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with previously untreated unresectable stage III or stage IV melanoma were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg once every 3 weeks (four doses) followed by nivolumab 3 mg/kg once every 2 weeks (n = 314), nivolumab 3 mg/kg once every 2 weeks (n = 316), or ipilimumab 3 mg/kg once every 3 weeks (four doses; n = 315). Coprimary end points were progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) with nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab versus ipilimumab. Secondary end points included objective response rate, descriptive efficacy assessments of nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus nivolumab alone, and safety. Melanoma-specific survival (MSS; descriptive analysis), which excludes deaths unrelated to melanoma, was also evaluated. RESULTS Median OS (minimum follow-up, 6.5 years) was 72.1, 36.9, and 19.9 months in the combination, nivolumab, and ipilimumab groups, respectively. Median MSS was not reached, 58.7, and 21.9 months, respectively; 6.5-year OS rates were 57%, 43%, and 25% in patients with BRAF-mutant tumors and 46%, 42%, and 22% in those with BRAF–wild-type tumors, respectively. In patients who discontinued treatment, the median treatment-free interval was 27.6, 2.3, and 1.9 months, respectively. Since the 5-year analysis, no new safety signals were observed. CONCLUSION These 6.5-year CheckMate 067 results, which include the longest median OS in a phase III melanoma trial reported to date and the first report of MSS, showed durable, improved clinical outcomes with nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab versus ipilimumab in patients with advanced melanoma and, in descriptive analyses, with the combination over nivolumab monotherapy.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Cited by 626 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3