Circulating Tumor-Macrophage Fusion Cells and Circulating Tumor Cells Complement Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Screening in Patients With Suspicious Lung-RADS 4 Nodules

Author:

Manjunath Yariswamy12,Suvilesh Kanve Nagaraj1ORCID,Mitchem Jonathan B.123,Avella Patino Diego M.12,Kimchi Eric T.123ORCID,Staveley-O'Carroll Kevin F.123,Pantel Klaus4,Yi Huang5,Li Guangfu12,Harris Peter K.35,Chaudhuri Aadel A.35ORCID,Kaifi Jussuf T.123ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery, Ellis Fischel Cancer Center, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO

2. Harry S. Truman Memorial Veterans' Hospital, Columbia, MO

3. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO

4. Institute for Tumor Biology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

5. Departments of Radiation Oncology, Genetics, and Computer Science and Engineering, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO

Abstract

PURPOSE Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening of high-risk patients decreases lung cancer–related mortality. However, high false-positive rates associated with LDCT result in unnecessary interventions. To distinguish non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from benign nodules, in the present study, we integrated cellular liquid biomarkers in patients with suspicious lung nodules (lung cancer screening reporting and data system [Lung-RADS] 4). METHODS Prospectively, 7.5 mL of blood was collected from 221 individuals (training set: 90 nonscreened NSCLC patients, 74 high-risk screening patients with no/benign nodules [Lung-RADS 1-3], and 20 never smokers; validation set: 37 patients with suspicious nodules [Lung-RADS 4]). Circulating tumor cells (CTCs), CTC clusters, and tumor-macrophage fusion (TMF) cells were identified by blinded analyses. Screening patients underwent a median of two LDCTs (range, 1-4) with a median surveillance time of 30 (range, 11-50) months. RESULTS In the validation set of 37 Lung-RADS 4 patients, all circulating cellular biomarker counts ( P < .005; Wilcoxon test) and positivity rates were significantly higher in 23 biopsy-proven NSCLC patients (CTCs: 23 of 23 [100%], CTC clusters: 6 of 23 [26.1%], and TMF cells: 15 of 23 [65.2%]) than in 14 patients with biopsy-proven benign nodules (6 of 14 [42.9%], 0 of 14 [0%], and 2 of 14 [14.3%]). On the basis of cutoff values from the training set, logistic regression with receiver operating characteristic and area under the curve analyses demonstrated that CTCs (sensitivity: 0.870, specificity: 1.0, and area under the curve: 0.989) and TMF cells (0.652; 0.880; 0.790) complement LDCT in diagnosing NSCLC in Lung-RADS 4 patients. CONCLUSION Cellular liquid biomarkers have a potential to complement LDCT interpretation of suspicious Lung-RADS 4 nodules to distinguish NSCLC from benign lung nodules. A future prospective, large-scale, multicenter clinical trial should validate the role of cellular liquid biomarkers in improving diagnostic accuracy in high-risk patients with Lung-RADS 4 nodules.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3