Real-world treatment patterns in third-line patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): The changing landscape in the United States.

Author:

Pal Sumanta Kumar1,Malangone Elisabetta2,Bhurke Sharvari2,Gorritz Magdaliz2,Stern Lee2,Coombs John3,Turnbull James D.3,Wang Xufang4,Liu Zhimei3

Affiliation:

1. City of Hope, Duarte, CA

2. LA-SER Analytica, New York, NY

3. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ

4. Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Florham Park, NJ

Abstract

390 Background: Several targeted therapies (TTs) have become available in mRCC in recent years for first- and second-line use, including sorafenib (So), sunitinib (Su), bevacizumab (Be), temsirolimus (Te), everolimus (Ev), pazopanib (Pa), and most recently, axitinib (Ax). This study aimed to examine the current treatment patterns in mRCC patients who fail second-line therapy. Methods: Data were obtained from a large national U.S. claims database for patients with an RCC diagnosis and at least 3 lines of TT between January 1, 2004, and June 30, 2011. Patients were age 18 or older at diagnosis with at least 3 months of follow-up prior to initiation of third-line therapy. Patient characteristics and treatment patterns were examined for the final population. Results: A total of 812 mRCC patients initiated third-line therapy with So, Su, Be, Te, Ev, or Pa. The sample was majority male (70%) with a mean age of 60 years (SD=10.7). A large proportion of patients were from the South (42%), and the majority of the sample (72%) had commercial insurance. The most common sites of metastases at any time were lung (71%) and bone (52%). The most common first-line agent was Su (52%) and the most common second-line single agents were Te (25%) and Ev (17%). The most frequently used single-agents in third-line were Te (21%) and Ev (19%). Third-line treatment choice differed by year; Te (51%) was most common in 2007 while Ev and Pa were most common between 2009 and 2011. Additionally, the most frequently prescribed sequences of single agents were VEGF→mTOR→VEGF (25%), VEGF→mTOR→mTOR (25%), and VEGF→VEGF→mTOR (22%). Conclusions: The results demonstrate a rapidly changing therapeutic scenario for mRCC in the United States. The number of targeted therapies prescribed in third-line increased from 1 in 2006 to 4 in 2007 and 6 in 2011. This evolution of third-line therapies is possibly due to physicians adapting their practice with the advent of novel mRCC treatment options. These results are in line with the NCCN guidelines, with VEGF and mTOR being the most commonly prescribed first- and second-line single agents, respectively.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3