Maintenance treatment with capecitabine and bevacizumab versus observation after induction treatment with chemotherapy and bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): The phase III CAIRO3 study of the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group (DCCG).

Author:

Koopman Miriam1,Simkens Lieke HJ2,Ten Tije Albert J.3,Creemers Geert-Jan4,Loosveld Olaf JL5,de Jongh Felix E.6,Erdkamp Frans7,Erjavec Zoran8,van der Torren Adelheid ME9,Van der Hoeven Jacobus JM10,Nieboer Peter11,Braun J. J.12,Jansen Rob L.13,Haasjes Janny G.14,Cats Annemieke15,Wals Jacob J.16,Mol Linda17,Dalesio Otilia18,van Tinteren Harm19,Punt Cornelis J. A.20

Affiliation:

1. University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands

2. Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands

3. Tergooi Hospital, Blaricum, Netherlands

4. Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands

5. Amphia Hospital, Breda, Netherlands

6. Department of Internal Medicine, Ikazia Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands

7. Orbis Medical Center, Sittard, Netherlands

8. Ommelander Hospital Group, Delfzijl, Netherlands

9. Groene Hart Hospital, Gouda, Netherlands

10. Medical Centre Alkmaar, Alkmaar, Netherlands

11. Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis Assen, Assen, Netherlands

12. Vlietland Hospital, Schiedam, Netherlands

13. Department of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands

14. Hospital Bethesda, Hoogeveen, Netherlands

15. Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands

16. Atrium Medical Center, Heerlen, Netherlands

17. Comprehensive Cancer Center the Netherlands, Nijmegen, Netherlands

18. The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands

19. Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands

20. Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Abstract

3502 Background: The optimal duration of chemotherapy and bevacizumab in mCRC is not well established. The CAIRO3 study investigated the efficacy of maintenance treatment with capecitabine plus bevacizumab versus observation in mCRC pts not progressing during induction treatment with capecitabine, oxaliplatin and bevacizumab (CAPOX-B). Methods: Previously untreated mCRC pts, PS 0-1, with stable disease or better after 6 cycles of CAPOX-B, not eligible for metastasectomy and eligible for future treatment with oxaliplatin, were randomized between observation (arm A) or maintenance treatment with capecitabine 625 mg/m2 bid dailycontinuouslyand bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg iv q 3 weeks (arm B). Upon first progression (PFS1), pts in both arms were treated with CAPOX-B until second progression (PFS2, primary endpoint). For pts not able to receive CAPOX-B upon PFS1, PFS2 was considered equal to PFS1. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and time to second progression (TTP2), which was defined as the time to progression or death on any treatment following PFS1. All endpoints were calculated from the time of randomization. Results: A total of 558 pts were randomized. Median follow-up is 33 months. The median number of maintenance cycles in arm B was 9 (range 1-54). The median PFS1 in arm A vs B was 4.1 vs 7.4 months (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.37-0.54, p<0.0001). Upon PFS1, 72% of pts received CAPOX-B in arm A and 44% in arm B. The median PFS2 was 10.4 vs 10.4 months (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.7-1.04, p=0.12). The median TTP2 in arm A vs B was 11.5 vs 15.4 months (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.48-0.72, p<0.0001), and the median OS was 17.9 vs 21.7 months (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.62-0.96, p=0.02), respectively. Conclusions: Maintenance treatment with capecitabine plus bevacizumab after 6 cycles CAPOX-B did not significantly prolong PFS2, which may be due to the lower number of pts in arm B that received CAPOX-B following PFS1. Maintenance treatment significantly prolonged PFS1, TTP2 and OS. Our data support the use of bevacizumab plus capecitabine until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Updated results will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT00442637.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3