Combination Early-Phase Trials of Anticancer Agents in Children and Adolescents

Author:

Moreno Lucas1ORCID,DuBois Steven G.2ORCID,Glade Bender Julia3ORCID,Mauguen Audrey3ORCID,Bird Nick4ORCID,Buenger Vickie5ORCID,Casanova Michela6ORCID,Doz François78ORCID,Fox Elizabeth9ORCID,Gore Lia1011ORCID,Hawkins Douglas S.1213ORCID,Izraeli Shai1415,Jones David T.W.1617ORCID,Kearns Pamela R.1819ORCID,Molenaar Jan J.2021ORCID,Nysom Karsten22ORCID,Pfister Stefan162324,Reaman Gregory25ORCID,Smith Malcolm26ORCID,Weigel Brenda27ORCID,Vassal Gilles282930ORCID,Zwaan Christian Michel2131ORCID,Paoletti Xavier32ORCID,Iasonos Alexia3ORCID,Pearson Andrew D.J.2829ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain

2. Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, MA

3. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

4. Solving Kids' Cancer UK, London, United Kingdom

5. Coalition Against Childhood Cancer (CAC2), Philadelphia, PA

6. Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy

7. Université Paris Cité, Paris, France

8. SIREDO Centre (Care, Innovation Research in Pediatric, Adolescent and Young Adults Oncology), Institut Curie, Paris, France

9. St Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN

10. Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO

11. University of Colorado, Aurora, CO

12. Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle, WA

13. Children’s Oncology Group

14. Rina Zaizov Pediatric Hematology Oncology Division, Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel, Petah Tikva, Israel

15. Hematological Malignancies Centre of Human Molecular Genetics and Biochemistry, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

16. Hopp Children’s Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), Heidelberg, Germany

17. NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom

18. Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands

19. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands

20. Division of Pediatric Neurooncology, DKFZ, KiTZ

21. Righospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark

22. Clinical Trial Unit and Childhood Brain Tumors, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany

23. Division of Pediatric Glioma Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany

24. Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom

25. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MA

26. National Cancer Institute, MA

27. University of Minnesota, MN

28. Innovative Therapies for Children with Cancer, Paris, France

29. ACCELERATE, Brussels, Belgium

30. Gustave Roussy Cancer Centre, Paris, France

31. Department of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology, Erasmus MC, Sophia Children’s Hospital, the Netherlands

32. Institut Curie, Paris, France

Abstract

PURPOSE There is an increasing need to evaluate innovative drugs for childhood cancer using combination strategies. Strong biological rationale and clinical experience suggest that multiple agents will be more efficacious than monotherapy for most diseases and may overcome resistance mechanisms and increase synergy. The process to evaluate these combination trials needs to maximize efficiency and should be agreed by all stakeholders. METHODS After a review of existing combination trial methodologies, regulatory requirements, and current results, a consensus among stakeholders was achieved. RESULTS Combinations of anticancer therapies should be developed on the basis of mechanism of action and robust preclinical evaluation, and may include data from adult clinical trials. The general principle for combination early-phase studies is that, when possible, clinical trials should be dose- and schedule-confirmatory rather than dose-exploratory, and every effort should be made to optimize doses early. Efficient early-phase combination trials should be seamless, including dose confirmation and randomized expansion. Dose evaluation designs for combinations depend on the extent of previous knowledge. If not previously evaluated, limited evaluation of monotherapy should be included in the same clinical trial as the combination. Randomized evaluation of a new agent plus standard therapy versus standard therapy is the most effective approach to isolate the effect and toxicity of the novel agent. Platform trials may be valuable in the evaluation of combination studies. Patient advocates and regulators should be engaged with investigators early in a proposed clinical development pathway and trial design must consider regulatory requirements. CONCLUSION An optimized, agreed approach to the design and evaluation of early-phase pediatric combination trials will accelerate drug development and benefit all stakeholders, most importantly children and adolescents with cancer.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3