Effectiveness of Intensive Versus Minimalist Follow-Up Regimen on Survival in Patients With Endometrial Cancer (TOTEM Study): A Randomized, Pragmatic, Parallel Group, Multicenter Trial

Author:

Zola Paolo1ORCID,Ciccone Giovannino2ORCID,Piovano Elisa3ORCID,Fuso Luca4,Di Cuonzo Daniela2,Castiglione Anna2,Pagano Eva2ORCID,Peirano Elena1,Landoni Fabio5,Sartori Enrico6ORCID,Narducci Fabrice7ORCID,Bertetto Oscar8,Ferrero Annamaria4ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. Dipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche, Università degli studi di Torino, Torino, Italy

2. Epidemiologia Clinica e Valutativa, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino e CPO Piemonte, Torino, Italy

3. SC Ginecologia e Ostetricia n. 3, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Ospedale Sant’Anna, Torino, Italy

4. SCDU Ginecologia e Ostetricia, AO Ordine Mauriziano Torino, Torino, Italy

5. Clinica Ginecologica UNIMIB, Ospedale San Gerardo, Monza, Italy

6. Divisione di Ostetricia e Ginecologia, Università di Brescia, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy

7. Département de Cancérologie Gynécologique, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France

8. AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy

Abstract

PURPOSE In the absence of clear evidence from randomized trials, the intensity of follow-up regimens after surgical treatment of endometrial cancer is highly variable in clinical practice. To reduce this uncertainty, we conducted a randomized trial to test whether an intensive (INT) versus a minimalist (MIN) follow-up regimen improves overall survival (OS) in patients undergoing operation for endometrial cancer. METHODS The TOTEM study was a large, pragmatic randomized trial, conducted in 42 hospitals (in Italy and France) including patients surgically treated for endometrial cancer, in complete clinical remission, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage I-IV. After stratification by center and risk of relapse (low or high), patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to INT or MIN hospital-based follow-up regimens. The study was powered to demonstrate an absolute improvement of 5% of the 5-year OS with the INT regimen. RESULTS In total, 1,871 patients were randomly assigned between November 2008 and July 2018, and 1,847 patients (98.7%) were available for the final analysis (60% low risk). After a median follow-up of 69 months, the 5-year OS was 90.6% in the INT and 91.9% in the MIN arms (hazard ratio, 1.13, 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.50, P = .380). No differences in OS were found in subgroup analyses considering age, cancer treatment, risk of relapse, and degree of adherence of the center to the scheduled follow-up. The probability of detecting a relapse was slightly higher in the INT arm (hazard ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.48; P = .194). CONCLUSION An INT follow-up in endometrial cancer–treated patients does not improve OS, even in high-risk patients. According to available evidence, there is no need to routinely add vaginal cytology, laboratory, or imaging investigations to the MIN regimens used in this trial.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3