Pathologic Complete Response and Individual Patient Prognosis After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Plus Anti–Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Therapy of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Positive Early Breast Cancer

Author:

van Mackelenbergh Marion T.1ORCID,Loibl Sibylle2ORCID,Untch Michael3ORCID,Buyse Marc4ORCID,Geyer Charles E.5,Gianni Luca6ORCID,Schneeweiss Andreas7ORCID,Conte Pierfranco8ORCID,Piccart Martine9ORCID,Bonnefoi Herve10ORCID,Jackisch Christian11ORCID,Nekljudova Valentina2ORCID,Tang Gong12ORCID,Valagussa Pinuccia13ORCID,Neate Colin14,Gelber Richard15ORCID,Poncet Coralie16,Squifflet Pierre4,Saad Everardo D.4ORCID,Heinzmann Dominik17,Denkert Carsten18ORCID,Rastogi Priya5,Cortes Javier19ORCID,Guarneri Valentina8ORCID,de Azambuja Evandro9ORCID,Cameron David20ORCID,Ismael Gustavo21ORCID,Wolmark Norman5,Cortazar Patricia22,

Affiliation:

1. Universitaetsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany

2. German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany

3. Helios Kliniken Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany

4. International Drug Development Institute (IDDI), Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium

5. NSABP Foundation and University of Pittsburgh/Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA

6. San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy

7. Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen, Heidelberg, Germany

8. Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova and Medical Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV—IRCCS, Padova, Italy

9. Institut Jules Bordet and Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Brussels, Belgium

10. Institut Bergonié and Université de Bordeaux INSERM U916, Bordeaux, France

11. Sana Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Offenbach, Germany

12. University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA

13. Fondazione Michelangelo, Milan, Italy

14. F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland

15. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health and Frontier Science and Technology Research Foundation, Boston, MA

16. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium

17. Product Development-Oncology, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland

18. Institut für Pathologie, Philipps-Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Marburg, Germany

19. IOB Institute of Oncology, Quiron Group, Madrid & Barcelona and Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain

20. Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, University of Edinburgh and NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, United Kingdom

21. Fundação Doutor Amaral Carvalho, Jaú, Brazil

22. Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA

Abstract

PURPOSE The achievement of pathologic complete response (pCR) is strongly prognostic for event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with early breast cancer (EBC), and adapting postneoadjuvant therapy improves long-term outcomes for patients with HER2-positive disease not achieving pCR. We sought to investigate prognostic factors for EFS and OS among patients with and without pCR after neoadjuvant systemic treatment consisting of chemotherapy plus anti-HER2 therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS We used individual data from 3,710 patients randomly assigned in 11 neoadjuvant trials for HER2-positive EBC with ≥100 patients enrolled, available data for pCR, EFS, and OS, and follow-up ≥3 years. We assessed baseline clinical tumor size (cT) and clinical nodal status (cN) as prognostic factors using stratified (by trial and treatment) Cox models separately for hormone receptor–positive versus hormone receptor–negative disease, and for patients who had pCR (pCR+; ypT0/is, ypN0) versus patients who did not achieve a pCR (pCR−). RESULTS The median follow-up overall was 61.2 months. In pCR+ patients, cT and cN were significant independent prognostic factors for EFS, whereas only cT was a significant predictor for OS. In pCR− patients, cT, cN, and hormone receptor status were significant independent predictors for both EFS and OS. Regardless of hormone receptor status, cT, and cN, the 5-year EFS/OS rates were higher in pCR+ patients than in pCR− patients. In most subsets with regards to hormone receptor and pCR status, cT and cN were independent prognostic factors for both EFS and OS, including pCR+ patients. CONCLUSION These results confirm that patients achieving pCR have far better survival outcomes than patients who do not. The traditional poor prognostic features, namely tumor size and nodal status, remain important even after a pCR.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3