Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Global Phase III Trial of Talimogene Laherparepvec Combined With Pembrolizumab for Advanced Melanoma

Author:

Chesney Jason A.1ORCID,Ribas Antoni2ORCID,Long Georgina V.34ORCID,Kirkwood John M.5ORCID,Dummer Reinhard6ORCID,Puzanov Igor7ORCID,Hoeller Christoph8,Gajewski Thomas F.9,Gutzmer Ralf1011ORCID,Rutkowski Piotr12ORCID,Demidov Lev13,Arenberger Petr14,Shin Sang Joon15,Ferrucci Pier Francesco16ORCID,Haydon Andrew17ORCID,Hyngstrom John18ORCID,van Thienen Johannes V.19,Haferkamp Sebastian20ORCID,Guilera Josep Malvehy21ORCID,Rapoport Bernardo Leon2223ORCID,VanderWalde Ari24ORCID,Diede Scott J.25ORCID,Anderson James R.25,Treichel Sheryl26,Chan Edward L.27,Bhatta Sumita27,Gansert Jennifer27,Hodi Frank Stephen28,Gogas Helen29ORCID

Affiliation:

1. UofL Health—Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY

2. Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA

3. Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

4. Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, NSW, Australia

5. UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA

6. University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

7. Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY

8. Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

9. University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL

10. Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany

11. Mühlenkreiskliniken Minden, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany

12. Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland

13. N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russia

14. University Hospital Královské Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic

15. Division of Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

16. Biotherapy of Tumors Unit, Department of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy

17. Department of Medical Oncology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia

18. Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT

19. Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

20. Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany

21. Department of Dermatology, Barcelona University, Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBER de Enfermedades Raras ISCIII, Madrid, Spain

22. The Medical Oncology Centre of Rosebank, Johannesburg, South Africa

23. Department of Immunology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa

24. Department of Hematology/Oncology, West Cancer Center & Research Institute, Memphis, TN

25. Merck & Co, Inc, Kenilworth, NJ

26. Amgen Inc, South San Francisco, CA

27. Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA

28. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

29. National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece

Abstract

PURPOSE The combination of talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) and pembrolizumab previously demonstrated an acceptable safety profile and an encouraging complete response rate (CRR) in patients with advanced melanoma in a phase Ib study. We report the efficacy and safety from a phase III, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, international study of T-VEC plus pembrolizumab (T-VEC-pembrolizumab) versus placebo plus pembrolizumab (placebo-pembrolizumab) in patients with advanced melanoma. METHODS Patients with stage IIIB-IVM1c unresectable melanoma, naïve to antiprogrammed cell death protein-1, were randomly assigned 1:1 to T-VEC-pembrolizumab or placebo-pembrolizumab. T-VEC was administered at ≤ 4 × 106 plaque-forming unit (PFU) followed by ≤ 4 × 108 PFU 3 weeks later and once every 2 weeks until dose 5 and once every 3 weeks thereafter. Pembrolizumab was administered intravenously 200 mg once every 3 weeks. The dual primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) per modified RECIST 1.1 by blinded independent central review and overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included objective response rate per mRECIST, CRR, and safety. Here, we report the primary analysis for PFS, the second preplanned interim analysis for OS, and the final analysis. RESULTS Overall, 692 patients were randomly assigned (346 T-VEC-pembrolizumab and 346 placebo-pembrolizumab). T-VEC-pembrolizumab did not significantly improve PFS (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.04; P = .13) or OS (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.22; P = .74) compared with placebo-pembrolizumab. The objective response rate was 48.6% for T-VEC-pembrolizumab (CRR 17.9%) and 41.3% for placebo-pembrolizumab (CRR 11.6%); the durable response rate was 42.2% and 34.1% for the arms, respectively. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 20.7% of patients in the T-VEC-pembrolizumab arm and in 19.5% of patients in the placebo-pembrolizumab arm. CONCLUSION T-VEC-pembrolizumab did not significantly improve PFS or OS compared with placebo-pembrolizumab. Safety results of the T-VEC-pembrolizumab combination were consistent with the safety profiles of each agent alone.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3