Impact of a Clinical Genomics Program on Trial Accrual for Targeted Treatments: Practical Approach Overcoming Barriers to Accrual for Underserved Patients

Author:

Farhangfar Carol J.1ORCID,Scarola Gregory T.12ORCID,Morris Victoria A.3ORCID,Farhangfar Farhang4,Dumas Kathryn56,Symanowski James7ORCID,Hwang Jimmy J.5,Mileham Kathryn F.5ORCID,Carrizosa Daniel R.5ORCID,Naumann R. Wendel8ORCID,Livasy Chad9,Kim Edward S.510,Raghavan Derek5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Translational Research, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC

2. Department of Surgery, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC

3. Department of Information and Analytics Services, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC

4. Department of Biospecimen Repository, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC

5. Department of Solid Tumor Oncology, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC

6. Johns Hopkins Medical Institution, Baltimore, MD

7. Department of Biostatistics, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC

8. Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC

9. Department of Pathology, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC

10. City of Hope, National Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA

Abstract

PURPOSE Clinical trials of novel and targeted agents increasingly require biomarkers for eligibility. Precision oncology continues to evolve, but challenges hamper broad use of molecular profiling (MP) that could increase the number of patients benefiting from targeted therapy. We implemented an integrated clinical genomics program (CGP), including a virtual Molecular Tumor Board (MTB), and examined its impact on MP use and impact on clinical trial accrual in a multisite regional-based cancer system with an emphasis on effects for isolated clinicians. METHODS We assessed MP and MTB use from 2010 to 2020 by practice location, physician experience, and patient characteristics. Use of MTB-recommended treatments was assessed. Clinical trial enrollment was evaluated for patients with MP versus MP and MTB review. RESULTS After CGP implementation, the number of physicians using MP and the number of MP tests increased ≥ 10-fold. The proportion of Hispanic patients with MP was the same as that in the system (both 2%) with marginal differences observed in the proportion of African Americans tested compared with the system population (16% v 19%). Physicians followed MTB treatment recommendations in 74% of cases. Rapid clinical decline was the most common reason why physicians did not follow MTB recommendations. Clinical trial accrual was 15% (669 of 4,459) for patients with MP alone and 28% (94 of 334) with both MP and MTB review. Clinical trial availability and patient out-of-pocket costs affected MP use. CONCLUSION Integrating CGP into clinical workflow with decision support tools, trial matching, and management of patient costs led to increased use of MP by physicians with all levels of experience, enhanced clinical trial accrual, and has the potential to reduce disparities in MP.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3