Nationwide Survey on Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Cancer Patients in Japan

Author:

Hyodo Ichinosuke1,Amano Noriko1,Eguchi Kenji1,Narabayashi Masaru1,Imanishi Jiro1,Hirai Midori1,Nakano Tomohito1,Takashima Shigemitsu1

Affiliation:

1. From the Medical Oncology Division and Surgical Oncology Division, National Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama; Tokai University of Medicine, Isehara; Saitama Medical College, Saitama; Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto; Kobe Pharmaceutical University, Kobe; and National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan

Abstract

PurposeTo determine the prevalence of use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) by patients with cancer in Japan, and to compare the characteristics of CAM users and CAM nonusers.Patients and MethodsA questionnaire on cancer CAM and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale were delivered to 6,607 patients who were treated in 16 cancer centers and 40 palliative care units.ResultsThere were 3,461 available replies for a response rate of 52.4%. The prevalence of CAM use was 44.6% (1,382 of 3,100) in cancer patients and 25.5% (92 of 361) in noncancer patients with benign tumors. Multiple logistic regression analysis determined that history of chemotherapy, institute (palliative care units), higher education, an altered outlook on life after cancer diagnosis, primary cancer site, and younger age were strongly associated with CAM use in cancer patients. Most of the CAM users with cancer (96.2%) used products such as mushrooms, herbs, and shark cartilage. The motivation for most CAM use was recommendation from family members or friends (77.7%) rather than personal choice (23.3%). Positive effects were experienced by 24.3% of CAM users with cancer, although all of them received conventional cancer therapy concurrently. Adverse reactions were reported by 5.3% of cancer patients. CAM products were used without sufficient information by 57.3% of users with cancer and without a consultation with a doctor by 60.7% of users.ConclusionThis survey revealed a high prevalence of CAM use among cancer patients, without sufficient information or consultation with their physicians. Oncologists should not ignore the CAM products used by their patients because of a lack of proven efficacy and safety.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Reference27 articles.

1. World Health Organization: WHO traditional medicine strategy 2002-2005 . http://www.who.int/medicines/organization/trm/orgtrmmain.shtml

2. Trends in Alternative Medicine Use in the United States, 1990-1997

3. The prevalence of complementary/Alternative medicine in cancer

4. Cassileth BR: Complementary and alternative cancer medicine. J Clin Oncol 17:44,1999-52,

5. Schraub S: Unproven methods in cancer: A worldwide problem. Support Care Cancer 8:10,2000-15,

Cited by 276 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3