Results From a Health Insurer's Clinical Pathway Program in Breast Cancer

Author:

Gautam Santosh1,Sylwestrzak Gosia1,Barron John1,Chen Xiaoxue1,Eleff Michael1,Debono David1,Nguyen Ann1,Fisch Michael1

Affiliation:

1. HealthCore, Wilmington, DE; Anthem National Accounts, New York, NY; Anthem, Bloomfield Hills, MI; Oncology Solutions, Woodland Hills, CA; and AIM Specialty Health, Chicago, IL

Abstract

Purpose: Pathway regimens are value-driven, evidence-based therapies that aim at high-quality, affordable cancer care. There are few real-world data to support the value of such regimens, especially for patients with breast cancer. Materials and Methods: Using nationally representative claims data from Anthem, together with clinical data from its Cancer Care Quality Program, we identified patients with breast cancer for whom chemotherapy was initiated between January 2015 and October 2016. On the basis of demographic and clinical characteristics, patients receiving a pathway regimen (on-pathway cohort) were matched to those who did not (off-pathway cohort) using 1:1 propensity score matching. We compared post–6-month quality-of-care outcomes including hospitalization, emergency department visits, need for supportive drugs such as granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, and cost outcomes between the cohorts. Results: There were 959 patients in each cohort after matching. Patients in both cohorts had a similar age distribution (median age, 52 years in the off-pathway cohort v 53 years in the on-pathway cohort), and most presented with stage II disease (49.4% in the off-pathway cohort v 49.8% in the on-pathway cohort); nearly two thirds of each cohort had hormone receptor positive cancer (67.3% in the off-pathway cohort v 64.9% in the on-pathway cohort). The two cohorts had similar rates of hospitalization and emergency department visits; however, the rate of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use was significantly lower in the on-pathway cohort (72.5% in the on-pathway cohort v 82.8% in the off-pathway cohort; odds ratio, 0.55; P ≤ .0001). The average post–6-month cost of care was $16,176 lower (95% CI, −$24,291 to −$8,061; P ≤ .0001) in the on-pathway cohort. Conclusion: Pathway regimens for breast cancer demonstrate an example of high-value care. They are associated with a reduced cost of care without compromising quality of care.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Health Policy,Oncology(nursing),Oncology

Reference40 articles.

1. US Cancer Statistics Working Group: United States cancer statistics: 1999-2014 incidence and mortality web-based report. Atlanta, GA, US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute, 2017. http://www.cdc.gov/uscs

2. US Cancer Statistics Working Group: Cancer among women. United States cancer statistics: 1999–2014 incidence and mortality web-based report. Atlanta, GA, Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and National Cancer Institute, 2017. http://www.cdc.gov/uscs

3. Effect of Screening and Adjuvant Therapy on Mortality from Breast Cancer

4. Immunotherapy in Breast Cancer: the Emerging Role of PD-1 and PD-L1

5. Breast cancer statistics, 2017, racial disparity in mortality by state

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3