Measure Scan and Synthesis of Palliative and End-of-Life Process Quality Measures for Advanced Cancer

Author:

O’Hanlon Claire E.1,Lindvall Charlotta2,Lorenz Karl A.34,Giannitrapani Karleen F.34,Garrido Melissa56,Asch Steven M.34,Wenger Neil7,Malin Jennifer8,Dy Sydney Morss9,Canning Mark1,Gamboa Raziel C.3,Walling Anne M.17

Affiliation:

1. Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Health Care System, Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, Los Angeles, CA

2. Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; and Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA

3. Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Center for Innovation to Implementation, Palo Alto, CA

4. Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA

5. Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Partnered Evidence-Based Policy Resource Center, Boston, MA

6. Department of Health Law, Policy, and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA

7. Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA

8. UnitedHealthcare, Los Angeles, CA

9. Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MDThe views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States Government.

Abstract

PURPOSE: Monitoring and improving the quality of palliative and end-of-life cancer care remain pressing needs in the United States. Among existing measures that assess the quality of palliative and end-of-life care, many operationalize similar concepts. We identified existing palliative care process measures and synthesized these measures to aid stakeholder prioritization that will facilitate health system implementation in patients with advanced cancer. METHODS: We reviewed MEDLINE/PubMed-indexed articles for process quality measures related to palliative and end-of-life care for patients with advanced cancer, supplemented by expert input. Measures were inductively grouped into “measure concepts” and higher-level groups. RESULTS: Literature review identified 226 unique measures from 23 measure sources, which we grouped into 64 measure concepts within 12 groups. Groups were advance care planning (11 measure concepts), pain (7), dyspnea (9), palliative care–specific issues (6), other specific symptoms (17), comprehensive assessment (2), symptom assessment (1), hospice/palliative care referral (1), spiritual care (2), mental health (5), information provision (2), and culturally appropriate care (1). CONCLUSION: Measure concepts covered the spectrum of care from acute symptom management to advance care planning and psychosocial needs, with variability in the number of measure concepts per group. This taxonomy of process quality measure concepts can be used by health systems seeking stakeholder input to prioritize targets for improving palliative and end-of-life care quality in patients with advanced cancer.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Oncology (nursing),Health Policy,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3