A prospective, randomized, open-label, phase III clinical trial of NovoTTF-100A versus best standard of care chemotherapy in patients with recurrent glioblastoma.

Author:

Stupp R.1,Kanner A.1,Engelhard H.1,Heidecke V.1,Taillibert S.1,Lieberman F. S.1,Dbalý V.1,Kirson E. D.1,Palti Y.1,Gutin P. H.1

Affiliation:

1. University of Lausanne Hospitals, Lausanne, Switzerland; Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; University of Illinois, Chicago, IL; Klinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany; Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital-Pierre et Marie Curie Paris VI University, Paris, France; University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Na Homolce, Prague, Czech Republic; NovoCure, Haifa, Israel; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

Abstract

LBA2007 Background: The NovoTTF is a portable, medical device delivering low intensity, intermediate frequency, alternating electric fields by means of noninvasive, disposable scalp electrodes. These tumor treatment fields (TTF) physically interfere with cell division and assembly of organelles. Methods: Adult pts (KPS≥70%) with recurrent GBM were randomized (stratified by surgery for recurrence and center) to either NovoTTF administered continuously (20-24h/day, 7 days/week) or the best standard chemotherapy (BSC) at each physicians’ discretion. Number of prior therapies was not limited. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The study was powered (80%) to detect a 60% increase in OS with a two tailed a of 0.05. Results: 237 pts were randomized (28 centers in the United States and Europe) to either TTF alone (120 pts) or BSC (117 pts). Patient characteristics were balanced, median age was 54 years (range 23-80), median KPS 80% (50-100). All had prior TMZ/RT, and the majority at least one prior therapy for recurrence. One-quarter had surgery for recurrence. Mean treatment duration was 4.4 mo (0-40) vs. 2.3 mo (0-15), median OS was 6.6 vs. 6.0 months for TTF and BSC, respectively (p=0.23, hazard ratio 0.84 [95% CI 0.63-1.12]), the 1-year survival rate 23.6% versus 20.8% (ns). PFS6 was 17.6% in both groups. Time to treatment failure favored the TTF group (HR 0.76 [0.57-1.02], p=0.07). Objective responses were more common in the TTF arm (12%) versus the BSC (6%). Related adverse events were mild-to-moderate skin rash beneath the electrodes in 17% of TTF treated pts. Hematological and other toxicities were observed at a significantly higher incidence in the BSC arm depending on the type of chemotherapy, no treatment-related deaths occurred. Treatment compliance with TTF was excellent with a median duration 20 hours/day. Conclusions: This is the first phase III, controlled clinical trial testing TTF, an entirely novel treatment modality. TTF had minimal toxicity, long-term treatment proved feasible. TTF as a single modality showed a higher response rate and longer time to treatment failure compared to best available chemotherapy. Overall survival also favored TTF, but did not reach statistical significance. In view of the above, TTF should be considered a valid novel treatment modality. [Table: see text]

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Cited by 16 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3