Affiliation:
1. From the Department of Pediatrics, Oncology/Hematology Division, University of Padova, Padova, Italy; Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; The Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, and The Royal Marsden Hospital, Children's Department, London, United Kingdom; and the Department of Oncology/Hematology, Pediatric Center Olgahospital, Stuttgart, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The European Collaborative MMT4-91 trial was conducted as a prospective nonrandomized study to evaluate the potential benefit of high-dose melphalan as consolidation of first complete remission in children with stage IV rhabdomyosarcoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-two patients in complete remission after six courses of chemotherapy received “megatherapy”: 42 received melphalan alone, whereas 10 received melphalan in combination with etoposide, carboplatin/etoposide, or thiotepa/busulfan and etoposide. The outcome of this group of patients was compared with that observed in 44 patients who were also in complete remission after six courses of identical chemotherapy (plus surgery or radiotherapy) but went on to receive a total of up to 12 courses of conventional chemotherapy (four cycles). No differences were found between the two groups regarding clinical characteristics, chemotherapy received before complete remission, or response to chemotherapy. In particular, there was no significant difference between the groups for site of primary tumor, histologic subtype, age at presentation, presence of bone or bone marrow metastases, or number of metastases. RESULTS: The 3-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 29.7% and 40%, respectively, for those receiving high-dose melphalan or other multiagent high-dose regimens and 19.2% and 27.7%, respectively, for those receiving standard chemotherapy. The difference was not statistically significant (P = .3 and P = .2 for EFS and OS, respectively). There was a significant prolongation in the time from the last day of high-dose chemotherapy or the end of chemotherapy cycle 4 to the time of relapse in those receiving megatherapy (168 days for patients receiving megatherapy v 104 days for those receiving standard therapy; P = .05). CONCLUSION: The addition of a high-dose alkylating agent to consolidation therapy may have prolonged progression-free survival in this poor-risk patient group, but it did not significantly improve the ultimate outcome.
Publisher
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
Reference29 articles.
1. The Third Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study.
2. Metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma and histologically similar tumors in childhood: A retrospective european multi-center analysis
3. Carli M, Colombatti R, Pinkerton R, et al: Prognostic factors in children with metastatic rhabdomiosarcoma: Results of the European Intergroup Studies (EIS) MMT ‘89 and MMT ‘91. Proc SIOP Med Pediatr Oncol 29:324,1997, (abstr 0-32)
4. Anderson JR, Ruby E, Link M, et al: Identification of a favorable subset of patients (PTS) with metastatic (MET) rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS): A report from the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group (IRSG). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 16:510,1997, (abstr 1836)
5. Atra A, Pinkerton CR: Autologous stem cell transplantation in solid tumours of childhood. Ann Med 28:159,1996-164,
Cited by
90 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献