Prospective Randomized Trial of Docetaxel Versus Doxorubicin in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer

Author:

Chan Stephen1,Friedrichs Kay1,Noel Daniel1,Pintér Tamàs1,Van Belle Simon1,Vorobiof Daniel1,Duarte Ricardo1,Gil Gil Miguel1,Bodrogi Istvan1,Murray Elizabeth1,Yelle Louise1,von Minckwitz Gunter1,Korec Stefan1,Simmonds Peter1,Buzzi Franco1,González Mancha Rosario1,Richardson Gary1,Walpole Euan1,Ronzoni Monica1,Murawsky Michael1,Alakl May1,Riva Alessandro1,Crown John1

Affiliation:

1. From the Department of Clinical Oncology, City Hospital, Nottingham, and CRC Wessex Medical Oncology Unit, Royal South Hants Hospital, Southampton, United Kingdom; Universitäts-Frauenklinik und Poliklinik, Universitäts-Krankenhaus Eppendorf, Hamburg, and Klinik für Gynäkologie und Onkologie, Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt, Germany; Oncology Department, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montreal, and Oncology Department, Hôpital Notre-Dame, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Oncoradiology...

Abstract

PURPOSE: This phase III study compared docetaxel and doxorubicin in patients with metastatic breast cancer who had received previous alkylating agent–containing chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive an intravenous infusion of docetaxel 100 mg/m2 or doxorubicin 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks for a maximum of seven treatment cycles. RESULTS: A total of 326 patients were randomized, 165 to receive doxorubicin and 161 to receive docetaxel. Overall, docetaxel produced a significantly higher rate of objective response than did doxorubicin (47.8% v 33.3%; P = .008). Docetaxel was also significantly more active than doxorubicin in patients with negative prognostic factors, such as visceral metastases (objective response, 46% v 29%) and resistance to prior chemotherapy (47% v 25%). Median time to progression was longer in the docetaxel group (26 weeks v 21 weeks; difference not significant). Median overall survival was similar in the two groups (docetaxel, 15 months; doxorubicin, 14 months). There was one death due to infection in each group, and an additional four deaths due to cardiotoxicity in the doxorubicin group. Although neutropenia was similar in both groups, febrile neutropenia and severe infection occurred more frequently in the doxorubicin group. For severe nonhematologic toxicity, the incidences of cardiac toxicity, nausea, vomiting, and stomatitis were higher among patients receiving doxorubicin, whereas diarrhea, neuropathy, fluid retention, and skin and nail changes were higher among patients receiving docetaxel. CONCLUSION: The observed differences in activity and toxicity profiles provide a basis for therapy choice and confirms the rationale for combination studies in early breast cancer.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3