Quality of life in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab: Results of the NCIC CTG and AGITG CO.17 trial

Author:

Au H.1,Karapetis C.1,Jonker D.1,O’Callaghan C.1,Kennecke H.1,Shapiro J.1,Tu D.1,Wierzbicki R.1,Zalcberg J.1,Moore M.1

Affiliation:

1. National Cancer Institute of Canada, Kingston, ON, Canada; Australasian Gastrointestinal Trials Group, Camperdown, Australia

Abstract

4002 Background: Cetuximab prolongs survival in pretreated advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) patients (pts). For these pts, the effect of palliative treatment on quality of life (QOL) is also an important outcome. Methods: CO.17 was a randomized controlled trial (n=572) of cetuximab combined with best supportive care (BSC) vs BSC alone in pts with pretreated epidermal growth factor receptor-positive advanced CRC. Primary endpoint was survival. QOL was a secondary endpoint using the EORTC QLQ-C30 at baseline, 4, 8, 16, and 24 weeks (wks). Primary endpoint for QOL compared physical function (PF) and global health status (Global) mean changes from baseline to 8 and 16 wks using Wilcoxon test. Negative change scores denote worsening QOL. The proportion of pts in either arm with at least a 10 unit deterioration at 8 and 16 wks from baseline was compared using Fischer’s exact test. Kaplan-Meier estimates and logrank tests on median time to definitive QOL deterioration, defined as at least a 10 unit deterioration in PF or Global, were evaluated. Exploratory analyses of all other scale and symptom change scores at 8 and 16 wks were also performed. Results: Compliance rates for QOL questionnaires was high at baseline, 94% each arm, but did drop off over time: 73% vs 60% at week 8 and 60% vs 39% at week 16 for cetuximab vs BSC, respectively. PF change scores at 8 wks were -3.9 for cetuximab vs -8.6 for BSC (p=.046); at 16 wks -5.9 vs -12.5 (p=.027). Global change scores were -0.5 vs -7.1 (p=.008) and -3.6 vs -15.2 (p=.008) at 8 and 16 wks respectively. The proportion of pts with deteriorating PF was 25% for cetuximab vs 35% for BSC at 8 wks (p=.051) and 30 vs 43% at 16 wks (p=.069). Deteriorating Global was seen in 23 vs 38% at 8 wks (p=.004) and 31 vs 49% at 16 wks (p=.0011). Time to PF deterioration was 5.4 months [95% CI 3.8–5.7] for cetuximab vs 3.7 months [2.0–3.9] for BSC (p=.022). Time to Global deterioration was 5.4 [3.9–5.7] vs 3.7 months [2.1–3.9] (p=.062). Exploratory analyses of all other scale and symptom change scores at 8 and 16 wks showed all differences of p<.05 also favored cetuximab. Conclusions: Cetuximab provides palliation in pretreated pts with advanced CRC, delaying deterioration in QOL as well as improving survival. [Table: see text]

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3