Adjuvant external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in the treatment of endometrial cancer: Results of the randomised MRC ASTEC and NCIC CTG EN.5 trial

Author:

Orton J.1,Blake P.1

Affiliation:

1. Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, London, United Kingdom

Abstract

5504 Background: Patients with stage I endometrial cancer at high risk of relapse generally receive adjuvant EBRT following surgery, despite lack of evidence that radiotherapy improves overall survival (OS). ASTEC/EN.5 was designed to investigate whether OS is improved by adjuvant EBRT. An important secondary outcome was pelvic recurrence-free survival. Methods: Patients were randomised to receive immediate EBRT (with linear accelerator delivering 40–46Gy in 20–25 fractions to pelvis) or no EBRT until clinically indicated. Vault brachytherapy (4Gy in 2 fractions (HDR) or 15Gy (LDR)) could be used regardless of EBRT allocation. Centers were required to specify in advance whether brachytherapy would be offered to all patients or to none. The study was powered both to 1) detect a 9–10% absolute improvement in 5-year OS with adjuvant EBRT; and 2) reliably exclude an absolute 5% difference in 5-year OS when combined with other major studies (PORTEC and GOG 99). Results: Between Oct 1996 to Apr 2005, 906 patients (452 EBRT, 454 no EBRT) were randomised internationally. Pre-treatment characteristics were well balanced: median age 66 years; 98% of women WHO PS 0–1; 30% with lymph nodes removed at surgery; 84% endometrioid histology; depth of invasion to endometrium only, inner half and outer half of myometrium 3%, 20% and 77%, respectively; degree of differentiation to grade 1, 2, and 3 26%, 42%, and 31%, respectively. 92% patients in EBRT arm received immediate treatment, 90% receiving all protocol specified treatment. 2% patients in no EBRT arm received immediate EBRT. Brachytherapy was given to 52% patients in both arms. Morbidity was higher in EBRT arm, 56% compared with 24% in no EBRT arm reporting complications of treatment. Grade 3 or higher toxicity was rare. With a median follow-up of 46 months at the time of analysis, 117(13%) have died and 136(17%) have recurred or died. 130 deaths are required to detect a 10% difference in 5-year OS with 5% significance level and 90% power and this will be achieved by April 2007. Conclusions: Compliance was high. Serious complications were rare. The ASTEC/EN.5 trial alone and in combination with PORTEC and GOG99 will answer the question of the benefit of post-operative adjuvant EBRT in patients with endometrial cancer. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3