Use of a Decision Aid to Help Caregivers Discuss Terminal Disease Status With a Family Member With Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Author:

Yun Young Ho1,Lee Myung Kyung1,Park Sohee1,Lee Jung Lim1,Park Jeanno1,Choi Youn Seon1,Lim Yeun Keun1,Kim Sam Yong1,Jeong Hyun Sik1,Kang Jung Hun1,Oh Ho-Suk1,Park Ji Chan1,Kim Si-Young1,Song Hong Suk1,Ro Jungsil1,Lee Keun Seok1,Heo Dae Seog1,Hong Young Seon1

Affiliation:

1. Young Ho Yun, Myung Kyung Lee, Sohee Park, Jungsil Ro, and Keun Seok Lee, National Cancer Center, Goyang; Jung Lim Lee, Fatima Hospital; Hong Suk Song, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Daegu; Jeanno Park, Bobath Memorial Hospital, Bundang; Youn Seon Choi, Korea University Guro Hospital; Si-Young Kim, Kyunghee University Hospital; Dae Seog Heo, Seoul National University Hospital and College of Medicine; Young Seon Hong, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St Mary's Hospital, Seoul; Yeun...

Abstract

Purpose We tested whether a decision aid explaining how to discuss the approach of death with a family member with cancer would help family caregivers decide to discuss a terminal prognosis. Patients and Methods We randomly assigned caregivers of terminally ill patients with cancer to a group that received a video and a companion workbook that showed either how they can discuss the prognosis with their patient (experimental arm) or how cancer pain can be controlled (control arm). At baseline and 1 month, we evaluated the decision to discuss terminal prognosis as the primary outcome. At 0, 1, 3, and 6 months, we assessed the caregivers' decisional conflict and satisfaction as secondary outcomes using a Decision Conflict Scale (DCS). Results We found no difference in changes in the decision to discuss terminal prognosis between the two groups. Conflict (P = .003), uncertainty (P = .019), and value clarity (P = .007) subscale scores and total DCS score (P = .008) improved from baseline to 1 month significantly more in the experimental arm than in the control arm. Over 6 months, the significant between-group differences continued for the conflict (P = .031), uncertainty (P = .014), and value clarity (P = .039) subscale scores and total DCS score (P = .040). Conclusion Decision aids can help caregivers, with the aid of trained professionals, to communicate with patients about their terminal illness.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3