Impact of immune assessment on patterns of care in stage II colon cancer.

Author:

Barzi Afsaneh1,Poage Graham M.2,Catteau Aurelie3,Vernerey Dewi4

Affiliation:

1. City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA;

2. HalioDx, Richmond, VA;

3. HalioDx, Marseille, France;

4. Methodology and Quality of Life in Oncology Unit, Besançon University Hospital, Besançon, France;

Abstract

295 Background: Approximately 25% of patients with colon cancer are diagnosed at stage II. Recommendations for adjuvant chemotherapy and follow-up for these patients are risk-based, however the benefit of therapy is not supported by consistent, robust evidence and there are physical and financial harms associated with adjuvant treatments. Immunoscore is a novel paradigm for risk refinement through measurement of the immune response to the tumor. However, the impact of this tool on physician recommendations for clinical management has yet to be defined. Methods: Medical oncologists were presented with 10 patient profiles (real-life, de-identified stage II cases submitted for clinical Immunoscore testing) and queried for their recommendations (adjuvant chemotherapy and frequency of surveillance) via an online survey. Next, they took part in a live meeting where the Immunoscore data were introduced and completed the same patient survey, but this time with the Immunoscore classification (High or Low) assigned. A physician was counted as influenced by immune response assessment when there was at least one therapeutic modification (chemotherapy decision or surveillance de-intensification) after an Immunoscore test result was provided. We hypothesized that a rate of practice change of 30% (H1) would be considered an impactful result, while 10% would not be impactful (H0). According to A’Hern’s design with a one-sided alpha of 5% and 80% power, 25 physicians needed to be included to test the hypothesis. If 6 or more practice changes (≥ 24%) were observed, the study would be considered positive. Results: Twenty-five physicians were enrolled, representing a range of practice settings from academic medical centers, to high-volume hospital networks, to private community practices; all physicians had experience in treating stage II colon cancer. On average, physicians elected to change their chemotherapy and/or surveillance recommendations 56% of the time, therefore the objective of the study was reached. All but one physician (96%) changed their recommendations for at least one case, while 92% (23/25) changed their preference for chemotherapy in at least 1 case. The rate of change for chemotherapy prescription was 36% per patient case (range: 7-13 changes). Altered surveillance strategies were infrequently observed when chemotherapy recommendations changed. Conclusions: In this physician survey of real-world stage II colon cancer cases, Immunoscore classification significantly impacted decision-making. This impact can translate into a significant reduction in non-value care.

Funder

HalioDx

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3