Assessing the impact of antiemetic guideline compliance on prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV): Results of the Nausea/Emesis Registry in Oncology (NERO).

Author:

Aapro Matti S.1,Chrápavá Marika2,Curca Razvan-Ovidiu D.3,Gales Laurentia4,Grigorescu Alexandru Calim5,Karlínová Bára2,Kellnerová Renata6,Petru Edgar7,Pluzanski Adam8,Rubach Maryna9,Steger Guenther G.10,Tesarova Petra11,Yordanov Nicolay12,Walaszkowska-Czyz Anna13

Affiliation:

1. Clinique de Genolier, Genolier, Switzerland;

2. Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Ltd., Brno, Czech Republic;

3. Emergency County Hospital, Alba Iulia, Romania;

4. Institute of Oncology & Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania;

5. Institute of Oncology Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania;

6. Angelini Pharma Česká Republika S.R.O., Brno, Czech Republic;

7. Universitätsklinik Graz, Graz, Austria;

8. Centrum Onkologii-Instytut, Klinika Nowotworów Płuca i Klatki Piersiowej, Warsaw, Poland;

9. Centrum Onkologii-Instytut, Oddział Chemioterapii Dziennej, Warszaw, Poland;

10. Department of Internal Medicine I, Department of Oncology and Gaston H. Glock Research Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria;

11. General University Hospital and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic;

12. Complex Cancer Center, Vratsa, Bulgaria;

13. Szpital Świętej Rodziny, Oddział Onkologiczny, Warsaw, Poland;

Abstract

12083 Background: Evidence-based antiemetic guidelines offer predominantly consistent recommendations for CINV prophylaxis. However, studies and surveys suggest that adherence to these recommendations is suboptimal. We explored potential inconsistencies between clinical practice and guideline-recommended treatment with a registry evaluating the effect of guideline-consistent CINV prophylaxis (GCCP) on patient outcomes. Methods: This was a prospective, non-interventional, observational, multicenter study designed to assess overall (0-120 h) complete response (CR: no emesis/no rescue use) rates in patients who received GCCP or guideline inconsistent CINV prophylaxis (GICP) using diaries for 5 days following chemotherapy. Cycle 1 results are presented in patients who received either 1) anthracycline/cyclosphosphamide (AC) highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC), non-AC HEC or carboplatin, with GCCP for all these groups consisting of prophylaxis with an NK1 receptor antagonist (RA), 5-HT3RA, and dexamethasone (DEX) prior to chemotherapy or 2) moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC), with GCCP consisting of a 5-HT3RA and DEX prior to chemotherapy as per MASCC 2016 guidelines. CR rates for cohorts deemed to be GCCP and GICP were compared using a chi-square test. Results: A total of 1,089 patients were part of the cycle 1 efficacy evaluation. Overall GCCP was 23% for all patients. CR rates were significantly higher in patients receiving GCCP versus GICP (Table). Conclusions: Consistent with prior studies, GCCP was very low. The primary endpoint of the study was achieved as there was a significant benefit of almost 10% improved prevention of CINV when administering GCCP. As per MASCC/ESMO guidelines such an absolute difference should be practice changing. Comprehensive multifaceted strategies are needed to achieve better adherence to antiemetic guidelines. [Table: see text]

Funder

Angelini Pharma Oestereich GmbH

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3