Phase II study of cemiplimab in patients (pts) with advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC): Longer follow-up.

Author:

Rischin Danny1,Khushalani Nikhil I.2,Schmults Chrysalyne D.3,Guminski Alexander David4,Chang Anne Lynn S.5,Lewis Karl D.6,Lim Annette May Ling7,Hernandez-Aya Leonel Fernando8,Hughes Brett Gordon Maxwell9,Schadendorf Dirk10,Hauschild Axel11,Stankevich Elizabeth12,Booth Jocelyn12,Li Siyu12,Chen Zhen13,Okoye Emmanuel14,Lowy Israel13,Fury Matthew G.13,Migden Michael Robert15

Affiliation:

1. Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia;

2. Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL;

3. Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA;

4. Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia;

5. Department of Dermatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Redwood City, CA;

6. University of Colorado Denver, School of Medicine, Aurora, CO;

7. Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia;

8. Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO;

9. Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital and University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia;

10. University Hospital Essen, Essen and German Cancer Consortium, Essen, Germany;

11. Schleswig-Holstein University Hospital, Kiel, Germany;

12. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Basking Ridge, NJ;

13. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY;

14. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., London, NY, United Kingdom;

15. Departments of Dermatology and Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX;

Abstract

10018 Background: Cemiplimab monotherapy achieves clinically meaningful activity in pts with advanced CSCC (metastatic [mCSCC] or locally advanced [laCSCC] not amenable to curative surgery or curative radiation) and has a safety profile consistent with other anti–PD-1 agents. Based on initial data (median follow-up of 9.4 months in the pivotal study, NCT02760498), cemiplimab (cemiplimab-rwlc in the US) was approved for the treatment of pts with advanced CSCC. Historical data shows median overall survival (OS) of approximately 15 months with conventional chemotherapy or EGFR inhibitors (ASCO 2019, e21033). We present ~1-year additional follow-up from the largest prospective data set in advanced CSCC. Methods: Pts received cemiplimab 3 mg/kg Q2W (Group [Gp] 1; mCSCC; Gp 2, laCSCC) or cemiplimab 350 mg Q3W (Gp 3, mCSCC). The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR; complete response + partial response) per independent central review (ICR). Data presented here are per investigator review (INV); ICR data will be available at the meeting. Results: 193 pts were enrolled (Gp 1, n = 59; Gp 2, n = 78; Gp 3, n = 56). 128 pts had received no prior anti-cancer systemic therapy, 65 pts were previously treated. As of Oct 11, 2019 (data cut-off), median duration of follow-up was 15.7 months (range: 0.6–36.1) among all pts; 18.5 months (range: 1.1–36.1) for Gp 1, 15.5 months (range: 0.8–35.0) for Gp 2, and 17.3 months (range: 0.6–26.3) for Gp 3. ORR per INV was 54.4% (95% CI: 47.1–61.6) for all pts; 50.8% (95% CI: 37.5–64.1) for Gp 1, 56.4% (95% CI: 44.7–67.6) for Gp 2, and 55.4% (95% CI: 41.5–68.7) for Gp 3. ORR per INV was 57.8% (95% CI: 48.8–66.5) among treatment-naïve pts and 47.7% (95% CI: 35.1–60.5) among previously treated pts. Median duration of response (DOR) has not been reached (observed DOR range: 1.8–34.2 months). In responding pts, estimated proportion of pts with ongoing response at 24 months was 76.0% (95% CI: 64.1–84.4). Median OS has not been reached. Estimated OS at 24 months was 73.3% (95% CI: 66.1–79.2). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) by any grade were fatigue (34.7%), diarrhea (27.5%), and nausea (23.8%). The most common grade ≥3 TEAEs were hypertension (4.7%) and anemia and cellulitis (each 4.1%). Conclusions: For pts with advanced CSCC, cemiplimab achieves ORRs, DOR and survival superior to what has been reported with other agents. Clinical trial information: NCT02760498.

Funder

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Sanofi

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Cited by 28 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3