Efficacy and safety results from a phase III trial of nivolumab (NIVO) alone or combined with ipilimumab (IPI) versus IPI alone in treatment-naive patients (pts) with advanced melanoma (MEL) (CheckMate 067).

Author:

Wolchok Jedd D.1,Chiarion-Sileni Vanna2,Gonzalez Rene3,Rutkowski Piotr4,Grob Jean Jacques5,Cowey Charles Lance6,Lao Christopher D.7,Schadendorf Dirk8,Ferrucci Pier Francesco9,Smylie Michael10,Dummer Reinhard11,Hill Andrew Graham12,Haanen John B. A. G.13,Maio Michele14,McArthur Grant A.15,Yang Arvin16,Rollin Linda17,Horak Christine E.16,Larkin James M. G.18,Hodi F. Stephen19

Affiliation:

1. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY

2. Oncology Institute of Veneto IRCCS, Padua, Italy

3. University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO

4. Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center & Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland

5. Hospital de la Timone, Marseille, France

6. Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas, TX

7. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

8. Department of Dermatology, University of Essen, Essen, Germany

9. European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy

10. Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada

11. Universitäts Spital, Zurich, Switzerland

12. Tasman Oncology Research, Queensland, Australia

13. Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands

14. University Hospital of Siena, Siena, Italy

15. Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Australia

16. Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ

17. Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, CT

18. Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom

19. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

Abstract

LBA1 Background: The results of a phase I study in MEL suggested complementary clinical activity with NIVO (a PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor) plus IPI (a CTLA-4 checkpoint inhibitor). Here, we report the results of a randomized, double-blind, phase III trial designed to evaluate NIVO combined with IPI or NIVO alone vs IPI alone in MEL. Methods: Treatment-naïve pts (N = 945) were randomized 1:1:1 to NIVO 1 mg/kg Q2W + IPI 3 mg/kg Q3W for 4 doses followed by NIVO 3 mg/kg Q2W, NIVO 3 mg/kg Q2W + placebo, or IPI 3 mg/kg Q3W for 4 doses + placebo, until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Pts were stratified by PD-L1 status, BRAF mutation status, and M-stage. Co-primary endpoints are progression-free survival (PFS) (reported here) and overall survival (pts continue to be followed). Secondary endpoints include objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST v1.1 and safety. Results: At a minimum follow-up of 9 months, NIVO + IPI and NIVO alone significantly improved PFS and ORR vs IPI (Table). Grade 3-4 drug-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 55.0%, 16.3%, and 27.3% of pts in the NIVO + IPI, NIVO, and IPI arms, respectively (most commonly diarrhea [9.3%, 2.2%, 6.1%], increased lipase [8.6%, 3.5%, 3.9%], increased alanine aminotransferase [8.3%, 1.3%, 1.6%], and colitis [7.7%, 0.6%, 8.7%]). Drug-related AEs led to discontinuation in 36.4%, 7.7%, and 14.8% of pts in the NIVO + IPI, NIVO, and IPI arms, with 0, 1, and 1 drug-related deaths, respectively. Efficacy outcomes by PD-L1 status will also be presented. Conclusions: NIVO + IPI and NIVO alone had superior clinical activity vs IPI alone. The results with NIVO + IPI and NIVO alone further suggest complementary activity of the two agents. There were no new safety signals or drug-related deaths observed with the combination. Clinical trial information: NCT01844505. [Table: see text]

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Cited by 47 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3