Cetuximab and Radiotherapy Versus Cisplatin and Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer: A Randomized Phase II Trial

Author:

Magrini Stefano Maria1,Buglione Michela1,Corvò Renzo1,Pirtoli Luigi1,Paiar Fabiola1,Ponticelli Pietro1,Petrucci Alessia1,Bacigalupo Almalina1,Crociani Monica1,Lastrucci Luciana1,Vecchio Stefania1,Bonomo Pierluigi1,Pasinetti Nadia1,Triggiani Luca1,Cavagnini Roberta1,Costa Loredana1,Tonoli Sandro1,Maddalo Marta1,Grisanti Salvatore1

Affiliation:

1. Stefano Maria Magrini, Michela Buglione, Nadia Pasinetti, Luca Triggiani, Roberta Cavagnini, Loredana Costa, Sandro Tonoli, and Marta Maddalo, Brescia University, Istituto del Radio O. Alberti, Spedali Civili Hospital; Renzo Corvò, Almalina Bacigalupo, and Stefania Vecchio, Istituto Di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico S. Martino, National Cancer Research Institute and University, Genova; Luigi Pirtoli and Monica Crociani, University of Siena, Siena; Fabiola Paiar and Pierluigi Bonomo, Azienda...

Abstract

Purpose No randomized trials have been conducted to directly compare radiotherapy (RT) with concomitant cisplatin (CDDP) versus concomitant cetuximab (CTX) as first-line treatment of locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. In this randomized trial, we compared these two treatment regimens in terms of compliance, toxicity, and efficacy. Patients and Methods Eligible patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either CDDP 40 mg/m2 once per week or CTX 400 mg/m2 as loading dose followed by CTX 250 mg/m2 once per week concomitant to radical RT. For primary end points, compliance to treatment was defined as number of days of treatment discontinuation and drug dosage reduction. The acute toxicity rate was defined according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria. Efficacy end points were local recurrence-free survival, metastasis-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival. Results The study was discontinued early because of slow accrual after the enrollment of 70 patients. RT discontinuation for more than 10 days occurred in 13% of patients given CTX and 0% given CDDP (P = .05). Drug dosage reduction occurred in 34% given CTX and 53% given CDDP (difference not significant). Toxicity profiles differed between the two arms, with hematologic, renal, and GI toxicities more frequent in the CDDP arm, and cutaneous toxicity and the need for nutritional support more frequent in the CTX arm. Serious adverse events related to treatment, including four versus one toxic deaths, were higher in the CTX arm (19% v 3%, P = .044). Locoregional control, patterns of failure, and survivals were similar between the treatment arms. Conclusion CTX concomitant to RT lowered compliance and increased acute toxicity rates. Efficacy outcomes were similar in both arms. These results raise the issue of appropriately selecting patients with head and neck cancer who can benefit from CTX in combination with RT.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3