Discussing goals of care preoperatively in high-risk oncologic surgery.

Author:

McGreevy Chris1,Kunac Anastasia1,Chokshi Ravi1,Smith Janet Harris1,Mazza Debra1,Mosenthal Anne C1

Affiliation:

1. Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ

Abstract

38 Background: Major oncologic surgery has a high incidence of perioperative morbidity. Despite these risks, most surgeons do not discuss goals of care prior to surgery. This study assessed the feasibility of a preoperative goals of care discussion for high risk oncologic surgery. Methods: Observational study of patients undergoing high risk surgery. Prior to surgery, patients were referred for consultation with a surgeon certified in both Palliative and Critical Care. Consultations followed a semi-structured template (table). Patient and conversation outcomes were assessed, and qualitative analysis of consult notes was performed to identify themes. Results: Twelve patients were approached and 11 participated. Mean time between consultation and surgery was 7 days (1-36). All patients named a health care proxy and expressed goals of care. Most (8/11) specified their preferences for life support. Themes included hope –surgery will return them to independence/home; fear – pain, anxiety; and faith–“it is up to God” as reason for not discussing suboptimal surgical outcomes. One patient declined surgery after discussion and transitioned to hospice. Ten survived to discharge: 6 to home (2 with hospice), 4 to rehab. Conclusions: Preoperative goals of care discussions are feasible for high risk oncologic surgery patients. Eliciting goals of care helped clarify wishes for life sustaining therapy. Goals of care discussions do not destroy hope, but can reveal unrealistic expectations for surgery and outcomes. [Table: see text]

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Goals of Care Discussions in High-Risk Surgery;Difficult Decisions in Surgery: An Evidence-Based Approach;2022

2. Peri-Operative DNR: An Ethical Dilemma;Difficult Decisions in Surgery: An Evidence-Based Approach;2022

3. Efficacy of an Online Curriculum for Perioperative Goals of Care and Code Status Discussions: A Randomized Controlled Trial;Anesthesia & Analgesia;2021-04-22

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3