Cost of care, discharge disposition, and survival of advanced cancer patients (ACP) receiving early inpatient palliative care (PC) compared to standard oncologic care (SOC) without palliative care.

Author:

Daugherty Christopher1,Johnson Julie1,Levine Stacie K.2,Wroblewski Kristen1,Lane Bradford2,Dale William3,Malec Monica4,Hlubocky Fay J.2

Affiliation:

1. University of Chicago, Chicago, IL;

2. University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL;

3. CIY, Chicago, IL;

4. University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL;

Abstract

130 Background: PC significantly enhances ACP quality of life, provides symptom control, improves transitions to end-of-life care, and mortality. However, the financial implications, discharge disposition, and survival benefits of early, inpatient PC compared to SOC remains less understood. Methods: Retrospective cohort analysis of ACP receiving either PC or SOC between Jan 2015-Dec 2015 (N=810). ACP cohorts were compared for demographics, costs, disposition, and survival. Financial costs collected included: fixed (overhead expenditures, facility maintenance, hospital property); variable (patient care supplies, diagnostic/therapeutic supplies, medications); operating (fixed, variable, breaking-even costs); direct (labor, materials, commissions, piece-rate wages, manufacturing supplies); indirect (production supervision salaries, quality control, insurance, depreciation). Univariate and multivariate analyses were completed. Results: 468 were admitted to PC and 342 to SOC. In comparison with SOC, PC were more likely to be: younger (61.1±13.2 vs. 62.5±13.0, p=0.02); African American (48% vs. 36%, p=0.0045); female (50% vs. 40%, p=0.005); and have shorter length of inpatient stay (5.7± 4.9 vs. 6.2±6.5, p=0.01). PC had significantly lower costs: direct ($9,478 vs. $10,416, p=0.01); indirect ($9,538 vs. $10,999, p=0.002); fixed ($10,308 vs. $12,076, p=0.001); variable ($8,709 vs. $ 9,339, p=0.02); operating ($19,017 vs. $21,416, p=0.003).Compared with SOC, ACP receiving PC were more likely to be discharged to: home (55% vs.45%, p=0.01); health care facilities (e.g. skilled nursing, inpatient rehabilitation) (36.1% vs. 20%, p=0.04); and hospice (home and inpatient) (7.7% vs. 5.8%, p=0.02). PC had overall greater median survival from the time of discharge (106.8±99.95 vs. 73.8±61.93, p=0.03) compared to SOC. Conclusions: Early PC results in less financial burden and greater cost savings for inpatient ACP including for those who are younger and underserved. These findings provide further evidence for policies arguing that ACP access to routine PC must become a health care priority.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Analysis of a telephone hotline for palliative care patients at home and their families;International Journal of Palliative Nursing;2023-12-02

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3