Lenalidomide Maintenance Compared With Placebo in Responding Elderly Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Treated With First-Line Rituximab Plus Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, and Prednisone
-
Published:2017-08-01
Issue:22
Volume:35
Page:2473-2481
-
ISSN:0732-183X
-
Container-title:Journal of Clinical Oncology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:JCO
Author:
Thieblemont Catherine1, Tilly Hervé1, Gomes da Silva Maria1, Casasnovas Rene-Olivier1, Fruchart Christophe1, Morschhauser Franck1, Haioun Corinne1, Lazarovici Julien1, Grosicka Anida1, Perrot Aurore1, Trotman Judith1, Sebban Catherine1, Caballero Dolores1, Greil Richard1, van Eygen Koen1, Cohen Amos M.1, Gonzalez Hugo1, Bouabdallah Reda1, Oberic Lucie1, Corront Bernadette1, Choufi Bachra1, Lopez-Guillermo Armando1, Catalano John1, Van Hoof Achiel1, Briere Josette1, Cabeçadas Jose1, Salles Gilles1, Gaulard Philippe1, Bosly Andre1, Coiffier Bertrand1
Affiliation:
1. Catherine Thieblemont, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis; Diderot University, Sorbonne Paris-Cité; Catherine Thieblemont and Josette Briere, Descartes University; Josette Briere, Hôpital Necker, Paris; Hervé Tilly, University of Rouen, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U1245, Rouen; Rene-Olivier Casasnovas, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon; Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale UMR1231, Dijon; Christophe Fruchart, Institut...
Abstract
Purpose The standard treatment of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is rituximab in combination with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP). Lenalidomide, an immunomodulatory agent, has shown activity in DLBCL. This randomized phase III trial compared lenalidomide as maintenance therapy with placebo in elderly patients with DLBCL who achieved a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) to R-CHOP induction. Methods Patients with previously untreated DLBCL or other aggressive B-cell lymphoma were 60 to 80 years old, had CR or PR after six or eight cycles of R-CHOP, and were randomly assigned to lenalidomide maintenance 25 mg/d or placebo for 21 days of every 28-day cycle for 24 months. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Results A total of 650 patients were randomly assigned. At the time of the primary analysis (December 2015), with a median follow-up of 39 months from random assignment, median PFS was not reached for lenalidomide maintenance versus 58.9 months for placebo (hazard ratio, 0.708; 95% CI, 0.537 to 0.933; P = .01). The result was consistent among analyzed subgroups (eg, male v female, age-adjusted International Prognostic Index 0 or 1 v 2 or 3, age younger than 70 v ≥ 70 years), response (PR v CR) after R-CHOP, and positron emission tomography status at assignment (negative v positive). With longer median follow-up of 52 months (October 2016), overall survival was similar between arms (hazard ratio, 1.218; 95% CI, 0.861 to 1.721; P = .26). Most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events associated with lenalidomide versus placebo maintenance were neutropenia (56% v 22%) and cutaneous reactions (5% v 1%), respectively. Conclusion Lenalidomide maintenance for 24 months after obtaining a CR or PR to R-CHOP significantly prolonged PFS in elderly patients with DLBCL.
Publisher
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
Subject
Cancer Research,Oncology
Cited by
159 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|