US Cancer Centers of Excellence Strategies for Increased Inclusion of Racial and Ethnic Minorities in Clinical Trials

Author:

Regnante Jeanne M.1,Richie Nicole A.2,Fashoyin-Aje Lola3,Vichnin Michelle4,Ford Marvella5,Roy Upal Basu6,Turner Kenneth7,Hall Laura Lee1,Gonzalez Evelyn8,Esnaola Nestor9,Clark Luther T.4,Adams Homer C.10,Alese Olatunji B.11,Gogineni Keerthi11,McNeill Lorna12,Petereit Daniel13,Sargeant Ify14,Dang Julie15,Obasaju Coleman16,Highsmith Quita2,Lee Simon Craddock17,Hoover Spencer C.18,Williams Erin L.17,Chen Moon S.15

Affiliation:

1. Sustainable Healthy Communities, Washington, DC

2. Genentech, South San Francisco, CA

3. US Food and Drug Administration, Bethesda, MD

4. Merck & Co, Kenilworth, NJ

5. Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC

6. LUNGevity Foundation, Chicago, IL

7. Johnson & Johnson, New Brunswick, NJ

8. Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA

9. Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX

10. Janssen Research & Development, Raritan, NJ

11. Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA

12. University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

13. Rapid City Regional Cancer Care Institute, Rapid City, SD

14. Ismedica, Wrinehill, United Kingdom

15. University of California, Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Davis, CA

16. Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, IN

17. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX

18. Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI

Abstract

PURPOSE: Participation of racial and ethnic minority groups (REMGs) in cancer trials is disproportionately low despite a high prevalence of certain cancers in REMG populations. We aimed to identify notable practices used by leading US cancer centers that facilitate REMG participation in cancer trials. METHODS: The National Minority Quality Forum and Sustainable Healthy Communities Diverse Cancer Communities Working Group developed criteria by which to identify eligible US cancer centers—REMGs comprise 10% or more of the catchment area; a 10% to 50% yearly accrual rate of REMGs in cancer trials; and the presence of formal community outreach and diversity enrollment programs. Cancer center leaders were interviewed to ascertain notable practices that facilitate REMG accrual in clinical trials. RESULTS: Eight cancer centers that met the Communities Working Group criteria were invited to participate in in-depth interviews. Notable strategies for increased REMG accrual to cancer trials were reported across five broad themes: commitment and center leadership, investigator training and mentoring, community engagement, patient engagement, and operational practices. Specific notable practices included increased engagement of health care professionals, the presence of formal processes for obtaining REMG patient/caregiver input on research projects, and engagement of community groups to drive REMG participation. Centers also reported an increase in the allocation of resources to improving health disparities and increased dedication of research staff to REMG engagement. CONCLUSION: We have identified notable practices that facilitate increased participation of REMGs in cancer trials. Wide implementation of such strategies across cancer centers is essential to ensure that all populations benefit from advances in an era of increasingly personalized treatment of cancer.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Health Policy,Oncology (nursing),Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3