Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Cetuximab Radiotherapy Is Not Superior to Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Head and Neck Carcinomas: Results of the GORTEC 2007-02 Phase III Randomized Trial
-
Published:2018-11-01
Issue:31
Volume:36
Page:3077-3083
-
ISSN:0732-183X
-
Container-title:Journal of Clinical Oncology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:JCO
Author:
Geoffrois Lionnel1, Martin Laurent1, De Raucourt Dominique1, Sun Xu Shan1, Tao Yungan1, Maingon Philippe1, Buffet Joëlle1, Pointreau Yoann1, Sire Christian1, Tuchais Claude1, Babin Emmanuel1, Coutte Alexandre1, Rolland Frédéric1, Kaminsky Marie-Christine1, Alfonsi Marc1, Lapeyre Michel1, Saliou Marie1, Lafond Cédric1, Jadaud Eric1, Gery Bernard1, Zawadi Ayman1, Tourani Jean-Marc1, Khoury Cédric1, Henry Anne Rose1, Hasbini Ali1, Guichard François1, Borel Christian1, Meert Nicolas1, Guillet Pierre1, Calais Marie-Hélène1, Garaud Pascal1, Bourhis Jean1
Affiliation:
1. Lionnel Geoffrois, Marie-Christine Kaminsky, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre Lès Nancy; Laurent Martin, Centre Guillaume le Conquérant; Dominique De Raucourt, Bernard Gery, Centre François Baclesse; Emmanuel Babin, Hopital Universitaire, Caen; Xu Shan Sun, Joëlle Buffet, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon, Besançon; Hôpital de Mulhouse, Mulhouse; Yungan Tao, Gustave-Roussy Institute, Villejuif; Philippe Maingon, Centre François Leclercq, Leclercq; Yoann Pointreau, Cédric Lafond...
Abstract
Purpose Both concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CT-RT) and cetuximab radiotherapy (cetux-RT) have been established as the standard of care for the treatment of locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. It was not known whether the addition of induction chemotherapy before cetux-RT could improve outcomes compared with standard of care CT-RT. Patients and Methods The current trial was restricted to patients with nonmetastatic N2b, N2c, or N3 squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck and fit for taxotere, cisplatin, fluorouracil (TPF). Patients were randomly assigned to receive three cycles of TPF followed by cetux-RT versus concurrent carboplatin fluorouracil and RT as recommended in National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. The trial was powered to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.66 in favor of TPF plus cetux-RT for progression-free survival at 2 years. The inclusion of 180 patients per arm was needed to achieve 80% power at a two-sided significance level of .05. Results Between 2009 and 2013, 370 patients were included. All patients and tumors characteristics were well balanced between arms. There were more cases of grade 3 and 4 neutropenia in the induction arm, and the induction TPF was associated with 6.6% treatment-related deaths. With a median follow-up of 2.8 years, 2-year progression-free survival was not different between both arms (CT-RT, 0.38 v TPF + cetux-RT, 0.36; HR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.73 to 1.20]; P = .58). HR was 0.98 (95% CI, 0.74 to 1.3; P = .90) for locoregional control and 1.12 (95% CI, 0.86 to 1.46; P = .39) for overall survival. These effects were observed regardless of p16 status. The rate of distant metastases was lower in the TPF arm (HR, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.30 to 0.99]; P = .05). Conclusion Induction TPF followed by cetux-RT did not improve outcomes compared with CT-RT in a population of patients with advanced cervical lymphadenopathy.
Publisher
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
Subject
Cancer Research,Oncology
Cited by
115 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|