Adjuvant capecitabine for biliary tract cancer: The BILCAP randomized study.

Author:

Primrose John Neil1,Fox Richard2,Palmer Daniel H.3,Prasad Raj4,Mirza Darius5,Anthoney David Alan6,Corrie Philippa7,Falk Stephen8,Wasan Harpreet Singh9,Ross Paul J.10,Wall Lucy R.11,Wadsley Jonathan12,Evans T.R. Jeffry13,Stocken Deborah14,Praseedom Raaj15,Cunningham David16,Garden O James17,Stubbs Clive18,Valle Juan W.19,Bridgewater John A.20

Affiliation:

1. University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom;

2. University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom;

3. Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool and Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Liverpool, United Kingdom;

4. Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom;

5. Birmingham Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom;

6. CRUK Clinical Cancer Centre, Leeds, United Kingdom;

7. Cambridge Cancer Trials Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom;

8. Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Bristol, United Kingdom;

9. Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom;

10. Guy's Hospital, London, United Kingdom;

11. Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom;

12. Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom;

13. University of Glasgow, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom;

14. Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom;

15. Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, United Kingdom;

16. Royal Marsden Hospital, Surrey, United Kingdom;

17. The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom;

18. Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom;

19. Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom;

20. University College London Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom;

Abstract

4006 Background: Despite improvements in multidisciplinary management, BTC has a poor outcome. Approximately 20% of cases are suitable for surgical resection with a 5 year survival of < 10%. BILCAP aimed to determine whether capecitabine (Cape) improves overall survival (OS) compared to observation (Obs) following radical surgery. Methods: Patients with completely-resected cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) or gallbladder cancer (including liver and pancreatic resection, as appropriate), with adequate biliary drainage, no ongoing infection, adequate renal, haematological and liver function, and ECOG PS ≤2, were randomized 1:1 to Cape (1250 mg/m2 D1-14 every 21 days, for 8 cycles) or Obs. Randomization was minimized on tumor site, resection status, ECOG PS and surgical center. The primary outcome was OS in the intention to treat (ITT) population. 410 patients were needed to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.69 (2-sided α = 0.05 and 80% power). HR was estimated by Cox survival model with adjustment for the minimization factors. Primary analysis performed with at least 24 months (m) follow-up. Results: 447 participants were randomized to Cape (n = 223) or Obs (n = 224) from 44 UK sites between 2006-2014. Median age was 63y (IQR 55, 69) and 201 (45%), 232 (52%), and 14 (3%) patients were ECOG PS 0, 1 and 2 respectively. Primary site: 84 (19%) intrahepatic, 128 (28%) hilar, 156 (35%) extrahepatic CCA and 79 (18%) muscle-invasive gallbladder cancers. Resection margins: R0 in 279 (62%) and R1 in 168 (38%); 207 (46%) were node-negative. Follow up was at least 36m in > 80% of surviving patients. By ITT analysis (n = 447), median OS was 51m (95%CI 35, 59) for Cape and 36m (95%CI 30, 45) for Obs, HR 0.80 (95%CI 0.63, 1.04; p = 0.097). Sensitivity analyses with adjustment for nodal status, grade of disease and gender indicated HR 0.71 (95%CI 0.55, 0.92 p < 0.01). In the per-protocol analysis (Cape n = 210, Obs n = 220) median OS was 53m (95%CI 40, NR) for Cape and 36m (95%CI 30, 44) for Obs, HR 0.75 (95%CI 0.58, 0.97; p = 0.028). Median RFS (ITT) was 25m (95%CI 19, 37) for Cape and 18m (95%CI 13, 28) for Obs. Grade 3-4 toxicity was less than anticipated. Conclusions: Cape improves OS in BTC when used as adjuvant and should become standard of care. Clinical trial information: ISRCTN72785446.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Cited by 164 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3